NYC Buildings
/
The Bronx
/
Wakefield
/
4210 Digney Avenue

4210 Digney Avenue,
Bronx, NY 10466

19 Units

Built in 1932

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.89 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
8
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 02, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
21
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 23, 2019: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... at ceiling (4 sq-ft) in the vestibule at public hall, 1st story original violation 13190029 issued 24-jul-19 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 03, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardent material at ceiling and wall at the roof bulkhead at public hall, 5th story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
4
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 25, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
Louis Clarke
2.2(2)
Site Manager
Agent
1 Property19 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
N
Nancy Haber
2.3(3)
Shareholder
Head Officer
2 Properties41 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
P
Panzer Building Corp.
2.3(3)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties41 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
I
Ira H. Panzer Testamentary Trust
2.3(3)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties41 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 3 years ago
4210 Digney Ave
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building is in a nice quite area. Love my neighbors!
Cons:
Pest control may be the worst always see water bugs from time to time in front of building. Also see Mice Droppings.
Advice to owner:
Be more Responsible to your building. Won’t hurt to come and do a Check up every other month.
Over 3 years ago
Do not rent
Former Tenant
Pros:
The proximity to public transportation and shop. The area is quiet for the most part.
Cons:
“Landlord” is unresponsive. Even those working for them have a difficult time contacting them.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here