NYC Buildings
/
The Bronx
/
Riverdale
/
Spuyten Duyvil
/
555 Kappock Street
Spuyten Duyvil

555 Kappock Street,
Manhattan, NY 10463

412 Units

•

Built in 1966

•

25 Floors

5(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    104 complaints
    Get rental reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.02 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    8
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    May 01, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective convector unit (hvac) at west wall in the 1st room from north located at apt 22f, 22nd story, 7th apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    2
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 03, 2019: section 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    River Point Towers Coop Inc
    5(1)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•459 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    E
    Eileen Shields
    0(0)
    Officer•
    521 Properties•38413 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 110
    D
    Douglas Elliman Property Management
    0(0)
    Agent•
    587 Properties•41774 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 330
    C
    Carl Reinlib
    5(1)
    Officer•
    2 Properties•459 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    just now
    Amazing, Clean, Apartment Building
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Doorman is great and it's very clean
    Cons:
    This building is probably not the best for young people but that's it.