A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.04 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 29, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 5h, 5th story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 29, 2024: § 27-2026 adm code repair the leaky and/or defective faucets at sink, in the kitchen located at apt 5h, 5th story, 4th apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 29, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches located at apt 1g, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Montery Apartment Assoc.lp
1.9(1)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•97 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
M
Matthew Kelly
2.9(3)
Officer•
4 Properties•401 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 26
V
Victor Lopez
1.9(1)
Site Manager•
1 Property•97 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
A
Adam Weinstein
3.4(16)
Head Officer•
34 Properties•3542 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 140
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
1.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Building review bad
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nothing , has change
Cons:
Party, loud music every weekend, drugs activities, managment amd worker has knowledge, a lot people living in with been part of the lease, building and entrance and stairs , elevator and front entrance glass door are dirty, never mop, just sitting down, they take the garbage , not cleaning enough after, marihuana and roaches , and most of tenants moving in ,party , get high , and some drugs activities, cámara record and the management and employed was there hands !!!
Advice to owner:
Manager are nasty , always replacing manager
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here