NYC Buildings
/
The Bronx
/
Kingsbridge
/
3050 Corlear Avenue

3050 Corlear Avenue,
Manhattan, NY 10463

63 Units

Built in 2009

7 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.12 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 18, 2020: § 27-2104 adm code post and maintain a proper sign on wall of entrance story showing the registration number assigned by the department and the address of the building. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 10, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 305, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 25, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Elvira Castillo
3.6(4)
Site Manager
1 Property63 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
L
Liberty Angeliades
3.6(4)
Head Officer
1 Property63 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
N
Newfield Real Estate Investment Services
3.6(4)
Agent
1 Property63 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
S
Sycamore Court Apartments LLC
3.6(4)
Corporate Owner
1 Property63 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 2 years ago
Building has gone downhill
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator is consistent and always working. Building lobby is very clean. Laundry room on each floor.
Cons:
Heating and cooling units provided by the building are extremely loud. Heating is not included. Hallway rugs are dirty. Bathrooms vents bring in all smells from other apartments, can smell when people are smoking. Some tenants some in common areas.
Roof is not well maintained. Washing machines aren’t always working. Windows don’t really block out noise well from outside.
Advice to owner:
Maintain the building better. Fine people who smoke inside the building. If people aren’t following the rules evict them, the rules need to apply to all not just some people.
Over 3 years ago
Pretty decent apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big kitchen with lots of counter space, rent stabilized
Cons:
Windows are not very sound insulating, can hear outside noise (such as kids screaming in the playground beside us, or the church bells ringing) very easily
Over 3 years ago
Formerly Fed Up
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean bldg, close to the 1 line, laundry room on ea floor.
Cons:
Cheap fixtures in units, no consistent water temperature. Major
amenities constantly under repair. Significant rains cause flooding in lobby. Exterior windows never cleaned.
Advice to owner:
Maintain the services and amenities you claim as selling tools to attract tenants
Over 3 years ago
Nice bldg, incompetent management
Former Tenant
Pros:
New appliances
Modern layouts
Great location
Private package room
Laundry on each floor
Cons:
Management doesn’t care about tenants
Super does bare minimum
Building left us without hot water and without laundry rooms for 5 weeks in the summer, in the middle of the pandemic, and only offered 10% rent reduction for that period
Advice to owner:
You’re going to start losing tenants if you don’t start showing some humanity and basic competence.

Building is advertised as doorman building but instead we have a property manager who sits at the desk, nitpicks at small issues, and claims nothing is her problem
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here