A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.27 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 29, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at south wall and ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 04, 2020: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 7e, 7th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
F
Front Door Management, LLC
2.3(13)
Agent•
130 Properties•1396 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 83
J
Javier Monroy
2(1)
Site Manager•
1 Property•33 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Cristanir Arroyo
2.3(16)
Head Officer•
131 Properties•1413 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 73
R
Ryty Forever, LLC
2(1)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•36 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
2 stars
Over 3 years ago
Mixed tenants
Former Tenant
Pros:
If you are part of the program that this building had to offer I would say their lack for their prográm people they go all out. But if you like myself who pays their own rent. Then you in for a surprise. Management doesn't care about anything but their rent. I've been taking to housing court About 15 times because their personal who accepts the rent don't do their job on updating their system. Now what do you think that does to my rental history
Cons:
If they would keep their screening process like when I went to my interview and keep to their do's and don't. And get their cameras up and running and keep the drug's out of the building it would be a great building
Advice to owner:
Stop the entrance to the building on the outside. Put your intercoms on the outside of the building. Get a better security door with the modern key fobs and put the intercoms direct to the tenants phone. It will stop allot of the unwanted traffic this building has. It's like this building is the local stop and get high. Haven't seen this type of setting since I visited my sister in-law in the projects on Webster back in THe year 2004
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here