1610 Sedgwick Avenue,
Bronx, NY 10453

98 Units

Built in 2011

9 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 12
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.62 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
32
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 18, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 sq ft all walls in the bathroom located at apt 3a, 3rd story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
72
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 18, 2024: § 27-2026 adm code repair the flushing apparatus and maintain same so as to flush effectively the water closet in the bathroom located at apt 3a, 3rd story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
54
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 17, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 6b, 6th story, 5th apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Adam Mermelstein
2.3(5)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties134 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
S
Sedgcliff
2.1(7)
Corporate Owner
5 Properties532 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 25
W
565 West 139 Street Holdings LLC
2.3(5)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties134 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
R
Riverview Redevelopment
1.6(4)
Corporate Owner
3 Properties481 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 20
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 2 years ago
Worst place to live. BEWARE!!!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nothing. Nothing. Nothing at all.
Cons:
Poor management, noisy neighbors, package thieves, large amount of drug/substance abusers, roaches, mice, broken elevators, power outages, thin walls, vehicles are constantly broken into in the garage, surrounding neighborhoods are consumed with violent crime, two fare zone (Uber is your expensive best friend), no parking after 7pm
Advice to owner:
You know better, but rather choose not to do better. You need to be investigated by the state and city considering that this building falls under HPD stipulations. You need to be brought up on federal charges. In due time!
Over 3 years ago
Nice building, lack of care
Former Tenant
Pros:
Key Fob Entrance, Multiple Elevators, Attached garage, laundromat in building
Cons:
Uncleanliness, Elevator Constantly out of order, Maintenance lacks responsiveness
Advice to owner:
Do better
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here