A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
35 Eastern Parkway Owner's Corp
3.3(12)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•86 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
T
Thomas Rohlman
3.6(67)
Head Officer•
32 Properties•710 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
P
Pine Management, Inc
3(14)
Agent•
2 Properties•130 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
L
Lloyd Pine
3.3(22)
Officer•
5 Properties•210 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (12)
3.75 stars
2 weeks ago
No big complaints
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, good water pressure, very quiet
Cons:
Largely unresponsive management
Advice to owner:
A clear communication pathway
3 stars
3 months ago
Great location, horrible management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location of this building is amazing
Cons:
The least responsive management company I’ve ever rented from. Several units had bedbugs and they never notified the building — had to find out through our tenant slack channel. They also refuse to do anything about the front doors which frequently malfunction and allow thieves to steal packages
Advice to owner:
Actually care about this building
3.62 stars
6 months ago
Worth it for the location
Former Tenant
Pros:
This building is in the perfect location—close to franklin, washington, vanderbilt, and most importantly the park! Having an elevator is amazing and there is laundry in the building as well. Great water pressure and good light. Super is kind and generally responsive.
Cons:
Management isn’t great and I think our neighbors with less recently updated units had issues with cockroaches, although we didn’t. One washer broke a while ago and still hasn’t really been fixed. Noise from eastern parkway is quite loud but not too much of an issue, and heat can be spotty towards the beginning of winter.
3.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Renew lease increase
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location and most of the studios and Apartments have a good light
Cons:
every year renewing the lease is a fight. It increment is high.
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Lies and disrespect in an excellent location
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Excellent location -Elevator usually works -Laundry in the building -Common spaces can get dirty but this is honestly pretty rare and the building’s porter is efficient and friendly
Cons:
-Lies about on-site super (as required by law a super must live on premises or within 200 ft, no such super since at least January 2020) -Management is not responsive to tenant complaints -Chronic heat problems in the winter -Front and back doors to building chronically broken allowing constant package theft and trespassing -In building laundry is expensive ($2.75/load) -Pet fee ($50/ month) -Impossible to get repairs done in a timely manner (usually takes several visits from several different inept service providers who never seem to be able to fix the problem entirely — from broken stove to leaks in the ceiling) -Exorbitant rent hikes year over year, recent move ou tt a included tenants who were faced with a 12% rent hike -Apartment door locks are unreliable (I’ve had to let two different neighbors into my apt via the fire escape because they were locked INTO their apartments and needed to exit their units via fire escape into another person’s unit aka mine)
Advice to owner:
Tenants frequently communicate these concerns to management and it is never respected - so this advice is not new. Hire an on site super who is polite and not condescending— did I mention ON SITE? Fix the intercom system for the building, it’s a safety hazard currently. Replace the front doors, a UPS driver recently stated he’s constantly struggled with the front doors of 35 Eastern Parkway for 27 years. Create a locked package area to prevent package theft. Create a repair report system that your staff actually use. Set goals to have repairs fixed in units with no more than two visits from a service provider. Fix the locks on all unit doors.
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
Unbeatable location, but is it really worth it?
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location location location.
Cons:
Overpriced, small units desperately need maintenance/updates. Issues can go unresolved for weeks. When they are addressed, Pine does the bare minimum to “fix” the problem. Some issues are never really addressed and happen over and over again. The doors to the building often don’t close or lock properly. The buzzer system often breaks. Package theft is a problem and Pine just dismisses it. Heat is inconsistent.
Advice to owner:
Actually respond when tenants have an issue and don’t just half ass it.
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not a bad place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good heat Can get too hot Great location
Cons:
Slow elevator Hard to get help when locked out
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Terrible, inconsiderate management company
Former Tenant
Pros:
Okay location. Nice floors.
Cons:
Stolen packages, regular water shut offs, harassment of tenants by property company
Advice to owner:
Stop using Geraldine Capasso as your broker. She charges fees for no-fee apartments.
3.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Lived there for 2.5 years without any major complaints
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location location location
Cons:
Bike and package theft
Advice to owner:
Give Donell a raise
2.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
A mixed bag
Former Tenant
Pros:
Love the location here, but the management is terrible
Cons:
One major appliance broke in our apartment and it took Pine MONTHS to fix it, even with weekly reminders.
My partner has lived in this unit for 4 years, always playing the rent on time. When I moved in, it was like pulling teeth to get a new tenant on the lease, and to get my partner’s original security deposit back. We called the management company nearly daily for several weeks with no response. We simply were requesting a copy of the executed lease - I’m not sure why this is so hard for them!
Advice to owner:
At least attempt to be responsive to your responsible tenants - a little communication goes a long way.
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great Location, Disappointing Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location can’t be beat. There’s a bike room, and great building staff.
Cons:
Management is terribly unresponsive to serious issues. The front door frequently breaks. The lights in the hallways shine brightly 24/7. The elevator is slow and rickety. The floors block little noise between units.
Advice to owner:
Invest in addressing the issues the tenants have repeatedly raised.
3.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great location, fine apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location and good layout for a small apartment
Cons:
Had issues with pests and management wasn’t always super responsive to issues. Elevator is very slow and there were many issues with the front doors to the building
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here