Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.04 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 18, 2019: section 27-2014 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. scrape and remove rust scales and paint with 2 coats of paint building front at fire escape
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 20, 2021: section 27-2005, 2007, 204.1 hmc code: arrange and make self-closing the doors at entrance to building 3rd at south at public hall, 1st story, section at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
V
Vera Keqaj
4.6(1)
Site Manager•
1 Property•46 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
P
Phil Cramer
4.6(1)
Shareholder•
1 Property•46 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
N
Nancy Lincoln Owners Corp
4.6(1)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•46 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
U
Unavailable Owner
4.6(1)
Owner•
1 Property•46 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
4.62 stars
9 months ago
Nice place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Its mostly coop owned so the residents take good care of the building though its older. Theres a responsive super on site and small laundry room. Theres a cage locker for packages which is a huge plus. People stay to themselves but say hello and are mostly quiet aside from the occasional loud tv I hear next door. I’ve never had a mouse or roach issue though you do sometimes see a centipede or ants during seasons change but thats standard for these buildings. Also a larger laundromat across the street if you prefer drop off or need big machines. Location is amazing and walking distance to two train stations, park, museum, botanical garden and library.
Cons:
Since its older theres sometimes issues with heat turning on and the boiler but management is good about calling in technicians. No elevator so its a walk up and some units are very small.