NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Crown Heights
/
255 Eastern Parkway C10
Crown Heights

255 Eastern Parkway C10,
Brooklyn, NY 11238

90 Units

•

Built in 1924

•

6 Floors

4.1(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    199 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    1.26 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    14
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 03, 2023: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak above ceiling in the bathroom located at apt d12, 4th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    68
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 07, 2023: section 27-2070 adm code provide an adequate supply of gas to the fixtures at range in the kitchen located at apt f15, 6th story, 4th apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    32
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Jan 02, 2023: section 27-2056.4(h) and 27-2056.17 adm code -correct failure to provide to the department within 45 days of demand all records required to be maintained by owner pursuant to local law 1 of 2004 related to lead-based paint notices, inspections and remediation/abatement activities.
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    T
    Toba Potosky
    4.4(40)
    Top Rated•
    Corporate Owner•
    74 Properties•5087 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 13
    J
    Janice Keller-mcdowall
    4.1(2)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•90 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    W
    Woodrow Wilson Condominium
    4.1(2)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•391 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    M
    Mary Frances Shaugnessy
    4.2(37)
    Head Officer•
    62 Properties•4385 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 12
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (2)

    Over 2 years ago
    Great staff, building is old and that comes with some challenges
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Staff is phenomenal, everyone is hardworking and caring and glad to know them. Larger prewar units a plus but each unit is owned separately.
    Cons:
    Boiler is constantly on the fritz, meaning heat and hot water frequently go out. Communication could be better about this, usually no warning or time frame on repairs
    Over 2 years ago
    Great building, but an old one
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Great staff, apartments are big and halls are kept clean
    Cons:
    Sometimes there are bugs. But they have the exterminator come every month.