808 Prospect Place,
Brooklyn, NY 11216

19 Units

Built in 1901

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 4
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
14
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 29, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective vinyl tiles at floor in the kitchen located at apt 16, 4th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Hazardous
28
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 29, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant plaster at ceiling at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 29, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinge in the entrance located at apt 16, 4th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Apr 02, 2019: § 27-2142 adm code apts have been vacated by this department and cannot be reoccupied until so ordered after proof of compliance for apts two single room at cellar, vacate # 147366
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
V
Veronica Humphries
3(49)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
35 Properties233 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 17
M
Michael Shah
2.2(5)
Head Officer
2 Properties47 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
D
Ds Brooklyn Portfolio Owner LLC
2.9(49)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
35 Properties276 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 20
J
Jeffrey Manocherian
2.9(50)
Head Officer
32 Properties253 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 20
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 2 years ago
Slum Lord Corporation Owned Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
The residents are nice and there is a sense of community
Cons:
Rats, Roaches, No Heat during Heat Season, Drunk People Loitering on Outside Steps Constantly, Noise, Chemical Smells Coming From Hair Salon, Bad Insulation, Cheap Construction, Unresponsive Management who Charges Random Fees, Company Thrives off of Evicting Rent Controlled Residents and Charging Naïve Younger Tenants More, Probably Causing Gentrification in the Neighborhood.
Advice to owner:
Hire more than one super for your 300 units, Fix the unit burned out from the electrical fire, Get better pest control/fix the holes in the building.
Over 3 years ago
Get what you paid for: not much.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is so solid. So much to do on Nostrand!
Cons:
The building is terrible at keeping the place clean. I have had a couple tickets still waiting to be received by management for fixing some things.
Advice to owner:
Increase weekly stop bys. There's poop on in the hallway right now.
Over 3 years ago
Didn't love it
Former Tenant
Pros:
It was in a nice location, pre-pandemic. Big rooms.
Cons:
No heat, lol. The owners were only responsive when something was going wrong in all the apartments, but not when it was just one...Management changed when we moved out so it could be different (left in 2020)
Advice to owner:
A better communication system and a deal live-in super would help.
Over 3 years ago
Easy access to public transport
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nothing to like
Cons:
Front of the building is always crowded with people who don’t live in the building,blocking entry to the building
Advice to owner:
Need to be more responsive to tenants complaint
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here