A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.5 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 07, 2020: § 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspected
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 07, 2020: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes consisting of house hold articles on 3rd story balcony ,building front stack
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 10, 2024: § 27-2033 adm code provide ready access to buildings heating system locked door at boiler room
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
421 Remsen LLC
2.9(44)
Corporate Owner•
16 Properties•229 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 8
U
Usher Shteinmetz
3.2(13)
Head Officer•
6 Properties•91 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
M
Moshe Neiman
3.7(4)
Agent•
1 Property•8 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
Ryan Forde
3.7(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•8 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
2.62 stars
2 months ago
Had to go to court to get security deposit
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location and bike storage
Cons:
No windows in what passes for a living room. Shoddily renovated. It took almost a year to get our security deposit back, and we had to go to court to get it. They did not return the full deposit.
Advice to owner:
Follow the law on security deposits
4.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Quiet building and comfortable living situation
Former Tenant
Pros:
Tenants were all respectful. Secure entry into building meant hardly any trouble with packages being stolen. Sizable units. Reliable water pressure and hot water.
Cons:
While air conditioner kicked in warm months it felt like the heater was constantly struggling. Probably needed to be replaced (had serviced 3-4 times over winter) but it kept getting band-aided back together.
4.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
nightmare landlord, extremely thin walls, felon living in ba
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very quiet (except the walls are super thin you can hear a whisper) Clean lobby Relatively safe quiet block
Cons:
There was a felon living in the basement that the landlord was illegally subletting the bike space to
Oh also they overcharged us for rent and then kept 300$ of our security deposit just claiming we "forgot" how much we put down
3.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
luckier than some in building
Former Tenant
Pros:
- great location - good light in some bedrooms - bike room very handy
Cons:
- tenants in other buildings owned by this landlord (moses neuman) have been on rent strike for 2 years due to 3-month loss of heat/hot water during covid-19 — are currently in lawsuit against him - mgmt has 1 super across 19 buildings in multiple boroughs - other units had issues with heat loss, black mold - huge hole behind fridge led to mouse issues, took building a long time to fix - sound carries a LOT through apartment - consistent package theft from entryway
Advice to owner:
respond to tenant concerns more quickly
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here