1087 Carroll Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11225

47 Units

Built in 1923

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
165 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.74 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
12
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 30, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 sq ft at ceiling in the kitchen located at apt d3, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from east at south , section ''d''
Show all
flag
Hazardous
16
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 30, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the kitchen located at apt d3, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from east at south , section ''d''
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
7
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 21, 2023: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt a3, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Sg 1087 LLC
2.9(8)
Corporate Owner
3 Properties67 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
R
Robin Gallant
3.1(60)
Head Officer
21 Properties1043 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 32
S
Sjp LLC
3(71)
Corporate Owner
40 Properties1899 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 59
G
Glen Viechweg
3(3)
Site Manager
1 Property47 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 1 year ago
Beautiful Building Suffers From Landlord Neglect
Former Tenant
Pros:
Honestly, there's a lot to love about the apartments themselves. They are pet-friendly, well laid out (if you have an original floor plan), loads of natural light, and a nice community of longtime residents.

The building itself has a lot of pre-war charm including the original (from 1925) tile work in the lobby and stairwells, hewn marble, etc.
Cons:
The common areas are poorly maintained (though the super tries), and it's clear that landlord isn't remotely interested in tending to the building because there are so many rent controlled and rent stabilized tenants that aren't profitable to them. Unless you've been around long enough, it's entirely unclear who to contact regarding necessary repairs, and the only time you ever hear from the landlord directly is when they email you (in ALL CAPS) to remind you to pay the rent or accuse you of being late in paying the rent.

Many of the older tenants fear reprisal from the landlord for raising critical issues, which often results in chronic issues for their units and those surrounding it. And if you do manage to get something fixed, it's largely a bandaid solution (e.g., tiling and plastering over water damage, patching floor boards, etc.).
Advice to owner:
Invest in the building! If you want to keep increasing the rent, then actually tend to the space and put some money into some light restoration.
Over 2 years ago
Landlord MIA
Former Tenant
Pros:
Sunny apartment in a neighborhood I loved.
Cons:
If you need to reach the landlord, you’re out of luck. Eventually I showed up at their office (which I had found through some extensive investigative Googling) and they were extremely rude. They eventually gave me an email address for a property manager and when I wrote him with my question I never heard back.
Also had an issue with a downstairs neighbor who used to pound on her ceiling and scream profanities at me when I was doing things like reading on my sofa or sleeping. Tried to talk with her and explain the noise wasn’t from me/try to find the source, but she would just scream.
Advice to owner:
No advice. They treat tenants poorly > tenants can’t get in touch to complain > tenants move out > they jack up the rent... I’m sure they’re happy with the system the way it is. But I’d tell prospective tenants to look elsewhere.
Over 2 years ago
Rent stabilized space but at a cost
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice space, rent stabilized
Cons:
Landlords unresponsive and unhelpful