178 Rochester Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11213

48 Units

Built in 1925

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 6
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
497 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.7 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
11
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 19, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspected
Show all
flag
Hazardous
32
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 27, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at ceiling at boiler room
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
38
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 19, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinge at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Feb 20, 2024: § 27-2091(c) adm code the property has been issued an order to identify and address underlying conditions and violations related to the order. failure to comply may result in extensive repair work to correct underlying conditions and related violations by hpd. charges for repair work done pursuant to this order, if not paid, will become tax liens on the property
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Marcellino Ramos
1.8(1)
Site Manager
1 Property48 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
D
Dina Gutfreund
1.8(1)
Officer
Head Officer
2 Properties96 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
R
Rochester Manor Associates LP
1.8(1)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties96 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
H
House & Gardens Management
1.8(1)
Agent
2 Properties96 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 2 years ago
Would Be Ashamed to Own a Property Like This One
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment building is located on, and near, many bus and train lines, and there are amazing local cafes and restaurants in the area, as well as a pedestrian path all along Eastern Parkway. There are many nice parks in the area.
Cons:
This apartment building is constantly infested with roaches and sometimes rodents, and leaks are a common occurrence. The super is nice and polite, but he has to constantly be reminded to fix things, and it takes him and the guys he pays forever to get to most tasks. He does nothing about rude tenants making noise and partying in the hallways, elevator, and staircases, and standing and being loud in front of 1st floor windows - day and night. The entrance door has large, gaping holes that let roaches and rodents in easily, and the vents have clearly not been cleaned in years (possibly a decade). Some of the neighbors are pleasant and mindful, but most of them are not. Most neighbors do not care how loud they are being or if they wake others up early in the morning or late at night. The management do absolutely nothing and they never answer phones or return calls after you send many messages. The guy who sweeps the hallways and staircases does a horrible job and only picks things up on the spot, and does not actually sanitize anything. There are constantly cigarette butts in the hallways and staircases, and some people smoke in the hallways or light up in the lobby and then exit the building - leaving smoke behind. Packages are often stolen if delivery people just leave them and you are not there to take the packages. Vandalism is also, sometimes, a problem. The building sometimes gas a rotten odor.
Advice to owner:
Hire competent, diligent people who can - and enjoy - cleaning and maintaining the property, and also are not afraid to confront problematic tenants and their guests when they are being disrespectfully loud and obnoxious at especially inconvenient hours. There should be no large, gaping holes in entrance and exit doors, and the vents and overall property should be properly and thoroughly sanitized and cleaned at least weekly, while spot cleaning should be daily. Buildings, especially old ones, require much attention and maintenance, and when you people are slum lords and let your properties run down simply because poor, marginalized people live there - some in rent-stabilized programs, you only add to the systemic problem and make people less likely to take pride in the property and take care of it. Also, if all of us are good enough to pay to live here, even it is a little bit, until you implement gentrification, we are good enough for you to respect and accommodate.