A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.53 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 28, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling in the 1st room from east located at apt f1, 6th story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
14
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 28, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code repair the roof so that it will not leak at the ceiling in the 1st room from east located at apt f1, 6th story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
20
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 27, 2024: § 27-2033 adm code provide ready access to buildings heating system locked door at boiler room, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
Theresa 157 Corp
3.4(3)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•75 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
H
Hedva Stavisky Weiss
3.4(3)
Head Officer•
3 Properties•115 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
A
Ador Housing & Development
2(3)
Agent•
8 Properties•263 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
E
Eliezer Spira
3.3(4)
Officer•
13 Properties•448 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
1.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
It’s only saving grace is the rent stabilization
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rent stabilized Convenient location
Cons:
Super gets an attitude when asked for help. There has been a decline in cleanliness in the past couple years (since the pandemic began). There was the occasional pest or two, but it’s gotten a lot worse. It’s disgusting, quite frankly. No laundry in building. There is also no package locker, so packages and shipments are frequently stolen and nothing is done about it.
2.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Unsatisfied tenant
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to major subway lines
Cons:
Rodent infestation, loud neighbors, superintendent doesn’t do much cleaning. Always a hassle to get anything fixed.
Advice to owner:
Need to be more responsive to tenants needs. Rodent problems need to be addressed. Apartments are out dated and need repairs.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here