NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Crown Heights
/
1474 Eastern Parkway
Crown Heights

1474 Eastern Parkway,
Brooklyn, NY 11233

36 Units

•

Built in 1910

•

4 Floors

3(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    44 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 3 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.3 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    1
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 24, 2023: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department north and east wall at public hall stairs , 4th story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    8
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 02, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the roof so that it will not leak at ceiling in the 2nd room from north at center located at apt 4e, 4th story
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    2
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 02, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 3c, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    S
    Shinda Managment Corporation
    3(1)
    Agent•
    2 Properties•36 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    C
    Christopher Bramwell
    3.1(8)
    Head Officer•
    74 Properties•1163 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 75
    C
    Cb Csh 2015 LLC
    2.4(2)
    Corporate Owner•
    35 Properties•354 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 42
    L
    Lenox And Pennamon Housing Development
    3.3(10)
    Corporate Owner•
    165 Properties•2618 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 176
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    Functional old building
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Management was good.
    Cons:
    General wear and tear