392 Kosciuszko Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11221

5 Units

Built in 1899

3 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.6 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 25, 2018: section 27-2013 admin. code: paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling at the south-east corner in the 2nd room from north at east located at apt 3, 2nd story, apartment at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 25, 2018: section 27-2005 admin. code: repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in uniform color the east wall inside the closet in the 1st room from north at east located at apt 3, 2nd story, apartment at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
392 And Mazel LLC
2.8(3)
Owner
Corporate Owner
1 Property5 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
J
Joel Karpen
2.8(3)
Site Manager
Agent
Head Officer
1 Property5 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

4 months ago
Beware of a horrible owner
Former Tenant
Pros:
Stabilized apartment building
Cons:
I am a real estate broker 10+ years and came across this case. A couple applied for unit 4R and the owner accepted them. After they signed the lease and moved all their furniture and belongings inside the apartment, the owner then changed their mind, kicked them out and locked the apartment after changing the lock with their belongings inside!!!
Inhumane treatment. Absolutely not acceptable. Do not rent here.
Advice to owner:
We are all human and we are all the same and nobody is above the law. Hope there will be a lawsuit. There will teach you a lesson. You cannot treat people like this.
Over 2 years ago
Apartment was OK, landlord was horrible
Former Tenant
Pros:
Smaller apartment at a premium price but the roof space had nice views
Cons:
Roof was in bad shape and ever time it rained every apartment had water in it. Floors had zero insulation in it, could hear everyone’s conversation when they talked that how bad they were. Landlord was total slumlord. Turns out he never got the building certified for occupancy after a year of everyone in the building paying him rent. First floor unit ended up being evicted by Red Cross due to black mold. Just all around disgusting property owner.
Over 3 years ago
Apartment leaked. Landlord scammed
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the J train, nice cross breeze in the summer. Back of building quiet.
Cons:
Ceilings all leaked during rainstorm. Landlord took 2 years to fix. Landlord took entire year to get building certified by the city for occupancy. All while renting the entire building, illegally, to tenants.

Landlord attempted to threaten several of the residents with false eviction notices.

First floor unit leaked so much that tenants were kicked out by the city due to dangerous mold conditions.
Advice to owner:
You are aware of the scams ran for this property.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here