NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Bedford-Stuyvesant
/
Stuyvesant Heights
/
50 Patchen Avenue
Stuyvesant Heights

50 Patchen Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11221

3 Units

•

Built in 1899

•

3 Floors

4(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 day ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.33 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    0
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 27, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    P
    50 Patchen LLC
    4(1)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•3 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    P
    Patrick Mullings
    4(1)
    Site Manager•
    Shareholder•
    Agent•
    Head Officer•
    1 Property•3 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 1 year ago
    lived here at the start of the pandemic
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Great apartment unit, close to train, immediately responsive when we had a mouse
    Cons:
    My roommate was harassed for rent by management at the start of the pandemic. This was when NY unemployment was so backed up that people weren’t even getting their checks yet. Just a few weeks into lockdown. Not only did they consistently pester via phone contact, even after explaining there was an outstanding balance because someone was suddenly unemployed and the unemployment was backed up state-wide, they had their accountant track my roommates tax information. They sent my roommate a letter in the mail saying they saw a stimulus check was on the way and that they expected rent to be paid as soon as it was received. To assume that stimulus was not necessary for anything else such as food or other daily necessities is inhumane, and to continue harassing someone during a global pandemic that hit New York City the hardest was extremely unethical and inappropriate. Especially knowing they suddenly lost their means of income and had nothing coming in at all besides that initial stimulant. I don’t know what they expected someone who’s unemployment had not been processed to do, but going as far as to pay or ask and accountant to find out when someone’s stimulus is arriving shows that it was not an issue of scarcity of resources, but a desire to assert power and harass someone during a global crisis.
    Advice to owner:
    To be considerate of humans and the fact that tenants are paying your mortgage for you.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here