NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Bedford-Stuyvesant
/
792 Dekalb Avenue
Bedford-Stuyvesant

792 Dekalb Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11221

4 Units

•

Built in 1931

•

3 Floors

1.7(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    8 complaints
    Get rental reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    5.75 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    8
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 09, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    2
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Feb 01, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... approx 7 sqft at ceiling in the 1st room from north at west located at apt 1 original violation 16277110 issued 30-sep-23 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    3
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 04, 2023: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at bsmt-apt 1
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    10
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 21, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (2)

    5 months ago
    Pushed out of building while demanding repairs
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Backyard with my furniture still in it
    Cons:
    This building has black mold in the walls due to heavy leaking from patio in unit 1 and bay window in unit 2. There are mice which have been reported to HPD and nothing was done. The mice led to fleas being in unit 2 and potentially unit 1. There were bed bugs in unit 1 and it was never reported to the city. Check the violations page on the housing department website. This is all true. Building manager Isaac Rosenberg led us into fraudulently believing our lease would be renewed only to deny us a new lease when we began demanding the leaks and mold be fixed. The black mold in the front bedroom of unit 2 was painted over and never properly fixed. I don't know what was done after we left unit 1 due to conditions that landlord refused to fix. Probably same. Then rent was increased by $500 when it was put back on the market as of a few days ago. Do not rent here.
    Advice to owner:
    Follow tenant right protection laws. Corruption and greed will ruin you.
    Over 1 year ago
    Cheap but not worth it
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    It’s cheap, cheap, and cheap. But not worth it
    Cons:
    It’s dirty, it’s breaking down, people move in and out constantly, mouse issue, VERY LOUD, and the landlord is sexiest
    Advice to owner:
    You were the worst landlord I ever had