A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.5 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 19, 2021: § 27-2043 adm code provide a lock and key to the entrance door of dwelling unit and, if a cl a multiple dwelling, also chain door guard in the entrance located at apt 206, 2nd story, 3rd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
10
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the roof so that it will not leak over ceiling in the 3rd room from east at south located at apt 502, 6th story, 5th apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the roof so that it will not leak over ceiling in the 1st room from east located at apt 502, 6th story, 5th apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
B
Bedford & Gates Realty Associates LLC
3.2(6)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•48 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
M
Mark Berkowitz
3.2(6)
Agent•
Head Officer•
1 Property•48 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
2 stars
4 months ago
Looks nice at first
Former Tenant
Pros:
Has decent amenities
Cons:
Unresponsive landlord Loud bro-y neighbors Shoddy construction
3.62 stars
10 months ago
Okay-ish but will move away after graduation
Former Tenant
Pros:
Always clean. Good elevator. Good gym.
Cons:
Always got locked inside the package room. Tickets never got responded. Rent too high for the service we got. Package got lost in the lobby.
Advice to owner:
DO BETTER
3.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
The bar is in hell
Former Tenant
Pros:
1. The overall layout of my apt. 2. The rooftop indoor / outdoor spaces 3. The package room 4. The keyless entry
Cons:
1. As per our lease we’re supposed to have a doorman and we don’t. Whenever it’s brought up to the building manager he tells us the building will raise our rent if we ask for one. 2. The lock mechanism on the building doors (building front door, rooftop door, gym door) are constantly breaking. 3. The package room lock sensor doesn’t work properly and we get “locked” inside the package room often. 4. Ppl are stealing our packages from the lobby all the time. We’re all pretty sure the cameras in the building don’t work.
Advice to owner:
Get us the door man we’ve been paying for and finish the work being done on the roof.
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
It's good enough
Former Tenant
Pros:
Roof top common area is incredible.
Cons:
Area is pretty rough. Walls are very thin.
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
Looks nice but built like crap
Former Tenant
Pros:
- new building - has rooftop and gym - has parking - some units have big patios
Cons:
- unfinished lobby - poor insulation between units - unfinished painting, hardware in “new” units - broken bathroom mirror and chipped tub in “new” unit - unprofessional management and maintenance - rowdy neighbors who throw parties on the communal roof or let their dogs piss up there - leaks in lobby and some units
Overall do NOT recommend
Advice to owner:
Hire a professional management company
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Beautiful apartments, negligent management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful light and floor to ceiling windows, rooftop with gorgeous views and privacy, good location, solid construction
Cons:
Haphazard finishings in some places for a “luxury” building, extremely unresponsive building management if anything breaks (can take up to 7-8 weeks to get things fixed)
Advice to owner:
Hire a more dedicated super who can address issues in a more timely fashion
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here