476 Quincy Street,Brooklyn, NY 11221
8 Units
•Built in 1910
•4 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 4
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.25 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
8
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Mar 28, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective electrical outlet at the north wall in the 1st room from north located at bsmt-apt baseme, 1st bsmt-apt from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
6
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Mar 28, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective ceramic floor tiles in the 4th room from north located at bsmt-apt baseme, 1st bsmt-apt from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
12
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 29, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective door at the entrance located at bsmt-apt baseme, 1st bsmt-apt from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
437 Throop LLC
3.8(5)
Owner•
1 Property•8 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
The nightmare on throop
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cleaning company upkept the building
Cons:
Terrible management, hidden fees, they will take you to court without hesitation
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Refund Deposit … what’s THAT?!!!!
Former Tenant
Pros:
B43 bus right outside. B52 bus around the corner.
Cons:
dirty hallways.
one washer AND one dryer for a four story walk-up with 2 apartments on each floor housing up to 4 people each.
lots of smoking in the building even though it IS smoke-free.
AND lastly, it took 4 months to get back rental deposits EVEN THO rent was NEvER late.
one washer AND one dryer for a four story walk-up with 2 apartments on each floor housing up to 4 people each.
lots of smoking in the building even though it IS smoke-free.
AND lastly, it took 4 months to get back rental deposits EVEN THO rent was NEvER late.
Advice to owner:
see above!!!
4.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Fine property to live in Bed Sty
Former Tenant
Pros:
Roof Access is great
Cons:
Not close to train station
Advice to owner:
Work on the basement
4.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Very Eh, Just Fine
Former Tenant
Pros:
Prompt response from management when plumbing issues arose.
Gave rapid verbal approval for a pet mid-lease.
Gave rapid verbal approval for a pet mid-lease.
Cons:
Apartment walls were not freshly painted or repaired upon move in.
Management company very strict and inflexible with subletters.
Management company threatened to hold security deposit if subletters were used (an illegal move according to an attorney).
No flexibility around partial and/or late rent due to pandemic.
Did not fix a shattered glass front door for many weeks.
Don’t work with tenants create a system to mitigate package theft.
Management company very strict and inflexible with subletters.
Management company threatened to hold security deposit if subletters were used (an illegal move according to an attorney).
No flexibility around partial and/or late rent due to pandemic.
Did not fix a shattered glass front door for many weeks.
Don’t work with tenants create a system to mitigate package theft.
Advice to owner:
If you treat your tenants as partners who are trustworthy and are friendly to them, you will go further. I would not recommend this property to others, and not because it’s the worst, but because it’s very average and there are many better options.
4.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Overall nice building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry onsite, well kept building, central heat and A/C, rooftop access with great views.
Cons:
I can’t speak for other units, but the bedroom I was in was really tiny (even for nyc standards) and had no closet. I knew what I was signing up for, so it’s not a major complaint. Some of the recent renovations were pretty cheap quality, so they look nice but started to fall apart just a tad.
Some tenants didn’t respect the rooftop space and trashed it a couple of times.
Some tenants didn’t respect the rooftop space and trashed it a couple of times.
Advice to owner:
I don’t know
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here