148 Hancock Street,Brooklyn, NY 11216
25 Units
•Built in 1899
•5 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.64 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 25, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all walls and ceiling at bulkhead at public hall, 5th story
Show all
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 25, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant plaster at ceiling and all walls at bulkhead at public hall, 5th story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 25, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinge at bulkhead door at public hall, 5th story
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 26, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
F
Fulton Estates LLC
2.8(4)
Lessee•
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•33 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
J
Jacob Fekete
2.8(4)
Lessee•
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•39 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Carl Zimmer
2.8(4)
Site Manager•
Head Officer•
2 Properties•31 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
1.88 stars
6 months ago
Basically slum lord of an owner
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, big windows
Cons:
The building is not properly maintained, broken stairs literally everywhere. The dust covering every inch of the hallways is from previous bandaid job construction they’ve done. The electric box is not up to code and literally still uses old fuses. The super is a drunk misogynist who will yell at you for asking to turn the heat on in late December. You have to file 311 reports with every maintenance request and then you have a 50/50 chance of it being fixed. Had to go through housing court to get security deposit returned and even though it was no proper amount.
Advice to owner:
Do better?
4.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not a bad spot
Former Tenant
Pros:
The super is really lovely, the building has good light, and things do eventually get fixed
Cons:
Noisy with the corner and the bus right there
2.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
take care of your tenants!
Former Tenant
Pros:
some nice neighbors, glad they kept alot of original details intact, carl is very nice!
Cons:
there’s often trash in the lobby and stairwells, garbage outside is full of rats, management is difficult to communicate with about repairs, water leaks, old appliances, system for storing packages so they dont get stolen is awful (no way of knowing if it’s locked in a utility closet in the lobby or it has been stolen)
2.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Poor management, many repair issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, super is very friendly and helpful.
Cons:
Management is difficult and unresponsive. The super is very friendly and helpful but management does not support him. The building has many issues with water leaks, faulty pipes, etc. Ceiling has caved in bathroom. Repairs happen on a slow timetable and management was difficult when compensating us for 60+ days in unhealthy bathroom living situation. Building is old and has many pest problems including mice and roaches and centipedes.
Advice to owner:
Put in more money to repairs, complete in timely manner
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here