A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.52 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
29
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 19, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling in the 1st room from east at south located at apt 101, 1st story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
67
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 19, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). missing in the entire apartment located at apt 101, 1st story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
11
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 19, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 101, 1st story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
V
Vincent Garcia
3.8(4)
Agent•
1 Property•70 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
M
Michael Garcia
3.5(13)
Site Manager•
Head Officer•
16 Properties•254 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
J
Jmp Properties LLC
3.3(12)
Corporate Owner•
15 Properties•238 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
4.25 stars
8 months ago
it’s not bad here!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator access, monthly pest control services, and decent sized units
Cons:
Lacks kitchen counter space, immediate area around neighborhood is increasingly unsafe
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
So noisy at this building!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rent prices were fair and super was live-in which helped. Management was pretty fast to respond via email and in the app.
Cons:
The building was noisy inside and out - no sound proofing from noise in the hallways & entryway. Packages were consistently stolen & management didn't seem to address. The neighborhood was not very safe and there were frequently people drugged out walking around the building.
Advice to owner:
Increase your safety mesaures
3.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Its fine for now
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good super & clean
Cons:
Slow or no response of management until you demand
3.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Ok but needs work
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator and super lived in building
Cons:
Mice living in walls caused infestation
Advice to owner:
Build better wall repellent
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here