588 Myrtle Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11205

17 Units

Built in 2014

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
816 Myrtle Development LLC
3.4(12)
Corporate Owner
8 Properties72 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Solomon Feder
3.9(8)
Head Officer
4 Properties43 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Y
Yedidye Leibler
3.3(4)
Agent
2 Properties17 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

4 months ago
Super is kind, Owners are not
Former Tenant
Pros:
The super is a great guy.
The pool table upstairs is nice.
Elevator is helpful
Cons:
The super has weekends off which is inconvenient for a move
The common TV space is disgusting and has no lights.
No secure place for packages to go.
Some bedrooms do not meet the legal definition -- windows don't open and no heating.
Lots of things were broken when we moved in
People smoke in the stairways
Elevator breaks randomly

There was no new paint when we moved in, but we were charged for more paint when we moved out. I requested a receipt for the paint they bought, as is my right, and they failed to produce it.
Advice to owner:
Stop by your building sometime.
Over 1 year ago
588 Myrtle review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super close to Pratt's campus which was nice as a student. The roof was a nice amenity too.
Cons:
The rooms are incredibly small, as an architecture student I now know they were only a couple inches above the code minimum. Only really big enough for a twin bed if you want any space at all. Secondly, there are just too many rooms per unit. My unit was a duplex for no discernable reason with 5 other roommates, so 6 of us total, sharing 2 bathrooms and what can only generously be described as a kitchen. The front door to the building is consistently broken and packages are stolen all the time. Additionally, the laundry in the basement has no way to set temperatures on the wash or dry cycles, so I had to go to a laundromat to do laundry.
Over 1 year ago
Not that stellar
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, nice view from the roof.
Cons:
Building seems really shoddily kept together, which is ridiculous considering the price. No central heating means tenants pay for heating through electrical AC. Not a very charming place
Advice to owner:
Clean up your act
Over 2 years ago
fifty - fifty
Former Tenant
Pros:
great location, roof, view.
generally clean building
Cons:
Exorbitant electric bills
lack of management's response to stolen packages from supposedly "locked and secure" building
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here