A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.14 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 27, 2023: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the east wall at public hall
Show all
Hazardous
7
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 06, 2023: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 3h, 4th story, 4th apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 18, 2024: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 4l, 4th story, 4th apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
109-111 Rutledge St. Realty LLC
3.3(89)
Corporate Owner•
36 Properties•737 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 17
K
Kre Bklyner 10 Lexington LLC
4(6)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•91 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Andrew Wrublin
3.4(24)
Head Officer•
3 Properties•199 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 10
D
Dalan Management
3.6(155)
Agent•
48 Properties•1568 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
4.75 stars
14 minutes ago
Nice affordable apt.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to G and AC, spacious, nice gym and shared areas, super is very responsive, younger tenants, pet friendly
Cons:
Bad efficiency rating, a couple of water issues here and there, old furniture in shared areas, mailroom can be a mess, amenity fees
Advice to owner:
See cons
4.25 stars
1 month ago
Perfectly Functional and Clean
Former Tenant
Pros:
- clean entryway - new appliances / countertops - lots of light - bike room and gym amenities -repair is quick and the handyman is responsive
Cons:
- horrible energy rating makes it so hot in summer and bills are very high - walls are thin and cheap - things like handles break etc
Advice to owner:
Spent money to improve energy
3.5 stars
8 months ago
Pretty good building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Balconies, decent natural light, dishwasher, good location
Cons:
Energy rating is very poor, utilities always very expensive
Thin walls
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
10 Lexington Review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Amazing location, beautiful building, great amenities like the gym and laundry room, feels very safe.
Cons:
The building seems cheaply made, with very thin walls, doors with little to no insulation, low water pressure and temperature, and appliances not built to last.
4.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Lexington Charm
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pros were the space. My roommates and I had a 4 bedroom 2 bathroom duplex - quite the steal! We were able to secure a deal during COVID. It was super convenient! Amenities were free and nice to have, the building was quiet, and the neighbors were nice. Loved the courtyard - it felt like you weren't even in NY. Gazmir was always super helpful! Also, they recently switched to using an app-based platform for maintenance requests - way easier.
Cons:
For major concerns, management would take a while to address. My advice is to go straight to Gazmir. I had water damage once on my ceiling and it took months to address. Also, they used to have pest control monthly then stopped when the new management came. I wish they continued because in the summer time we'd see more pests. If you have a balcony get a screen to prevent any bugs.
3.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Poor management
Former Tenant
Pros:
A lot of space
Cons:
Gas bill is always high. No matter how much heat you use. You pay a “ Delivery fee” which is higher than your usage. “Delivery fee” $150 and usage $9-16 Managment doesn’t communicate with tenants or respond. People are really loud always slamming doors (your door vibrates) not good if you a sleeping baby and dogs barking for any noise they hear or someone walking by.
Advice to owner:
Respond to questions tenants have Follow up with tenants and communicate what’s going in the building. Painting, something not working or construction etc
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here