NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Williamsburg
/
383 Hooper St
Williamsburg

383 Hooper St,
Brooklyn, NY 11211

32 Units

•

Built in 1916

•

6 Floors

2.2(6)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    2.37 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    6
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 01, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation heat riser pipe in the bathroom located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    52
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 13, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). missing in the entire apartment located at apt 32, 6th story, 1st apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    18
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 13, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at vestibule door , 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    H
    381 Hooper LLC
    2.2(6)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•71 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 4
    K
    Knoll & Weinberg Realty Corp.
    2.5(35)
    Corporate Owner•
    21 Properties•514 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 16
    J
    Julian Bana
    2.2(6)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•32 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    D
    David Tennenbaum
    2.2(6)
    Head Officer•
    2 Properties•63 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (6)

    1 month ago
    Old building, unit nice, bad management
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Great location
    Our unit is renovated so nice amenities like washer/dryer/dishwasher but the management does not maintain them
    Cons:
    Washer/dryer are not serviced
    Dirty stairwell
    TONs of pigeons & rats outside
    Like… a lot of rats
    Horrible management (so bad the city sent our representative to check in on us to escalate issues)
    Dismissive super
    Cockroaches & mice sometimes even though we are clean
    Advice to owner:
    Horrible management, cannot reach you. Super can’t help us because you do not provide funds or resources & are unresponsive. City council is involved since you are so horrible.
    2 months ago
    Nice location - Stabilized
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Rent Stabilized, good location
    Cons:
    Owner does not care about tenants. Repairs are never made.
    6 months ago
    Convenient Location - that’s about it
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    I have an updated unit, so I don’t have any complaints about my apartment:
    - Good water pressure
    - Can be Hell hot in the winter
    - Super up until now has been pretty good and keeps people who don’t live in the building and cause trouble out.
    - Fios or Spectrum internet option
    Cons:
    - Getting a new super that is wildly underpaid, so I don’t expect the cleanliness to be upheld.
    - The heat/hot water goes out a few times every winter.
    - Occasional pest sighting
    - MGMT is quite literally impossible to grt in contact with - they are in the top 10 worst landlords in the city list (literally)
    - Neighboring building has a bunch of drug addicts with a friend in this one and can make a lot of noise.
    - Packages get stolen somewhat regularly
    Advice to owner:
    Answer your phone and keep your buildings clean.
    Over 1 year ago
    The roof is gonna cave in
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    inexpensive, rent stabilized, gut reno'd, good location
    Cons:
    The super deals heroin. There are broken crack pipes in the stairwell. You can smell cigarette smoke coming in from other units, and everytime it rains there is a huge pool of water on the roof that never seems to fully go away.
    Advice to owner:
    fix the place up instead of slap/dash fixes
    Over 3 years ago
    Crack den outside
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Heat, price, windows
    Cons:
    Everything, building is 60 years old, absent landlord, takes forever for things to be fixed and they break a lot
    Advice to owner:
    Just awful and spend money
    Over 3 years ago
    Not the worst
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Large apartments, excellent water pressure, built 1916 or earlier & was once a beautiful building, wide staircase, great convenient location close to multiple train lines.
    Cons:
    Shoddy poorly done quick fix repairs done by unskilled workers, grimy rarely cleaned hallways/stairs unswept for weeks, massive long-term heroin dealer/user issues outside & inside building, abandoned building w/ homeless encampment nextdoor, constant clogged drain on roof creates lake of rain water, super never wore mask through entire pandemic including while inside tenants apartments
    Advice to owner:
    At the very least make someone sweep/clean hallways & stairs on regular basis.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here