310 South 3 Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11211

35 Units

Built in 1914

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
41 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.28 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 29, 2024: § 27-2010, 2011, 2012 adm code remove the accumulation of refuse and/or rubbish and maintain in a clean condition the trash accumulation at fire passage way
Show all
flag
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Apr 07, 2021: section 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the north wall inside sink base cabinet in the kitchen located at apt 18, 4th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 28, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 34, 6th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
The Smk Guaranty Trust
2.4(10)
Corporate Owner
9 Properties192 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
S
Sholem Kestenbaum
2(8)
Agent
Officer
6 Properties149 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Amir Morina
2.4(3)
Site Manager
1 Property35 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
S
Sam Kay
2.4(3)
Agent
Officer
2 Properties38 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 2 years ago
Landlords are slumlords
Former Tenant
Pros:
The bodega downstairs
Cons:
This place is a pit with high rent. The landlords do not respond to requests and cheat you out of money. Do not rent with this building.
Advice to owner:
Be a human.
Over 2 years ago
Not the worst but far from the best
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building was super quiet and the other tenants were all great.
Cons:
There was a roach problem regardless of how often I cleaned or what products I used. Pest control was supposed to come every month, but I only saw them once in the 2 years I lived there. Emails to property management about lease issues or repairs would take weeks to get a response.
Over 2 years ago
Worst, most predatory management ever
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building was fine, cockroaches but the first floor so what can you say. Heat worked, you get what you pay for I guess. Not the best but liveableish
Cons:
The most despicable, non responsive, predatory management ever. Refused to give back security deposit after being non responsive for MONTHS. We ask for a reason why, and they dont respond for another few weeks - finally they tell us the apartment was filthy with no itemized lists or costs or receipts. Mind you this is after we are fully moved out, half a month after our lease has ended. Considering that this apartment has a largely primary language spanish speaking and lower income community, I am not surprised they take full advantage of withholding security deposits.

One more thing, they never respond to any contact about fixing anything ever. The super is your only hope. And he isn’t a full fledged repair company. He cant take black mold out of the building. The management wont fix anything that they arent forced to fix by some higher power. We had a mushroom grow out of our ceiling because the piping in the walls were so moist.
Advice to owner:
Respect humans who you provide housing for