Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
Less than 0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
Litto , Judith C
2.8(1)
Owner•
1 Property•2 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Don’t be fooled
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment itself is nice, small, but has had good upkeep. Kitchen renovations are very nice, chandeliers in apartment Pretty entrance way to the building All utilities were included except for internet which is great + (however no control of heat so get ready to sweat)
For being so close to the subway, the noise was never an issue
Cons:
I think 17 open violations speaks for itself.
Building is listed as 2 family; it’s not. There are two apartments on the top floor and landlord lives on the bottom.
No buzzer on door for the apartments
Rent late fee- was $75 after 2 days late, which is quite a short grace period compared to norm. However beware, make sure you read your lease throughly! Landlord intended it to read as $75per day - insane! (Also illegal)
No separate mailbox. If mail or packages are left in front of landlords door, she will not look at the name and she will open them simply because they were put by her door. When addressed I was told to pay for a PO Box if I had a problem with it
Unorganized- no spare key for apartment. Was up to tenant to make copies. Was also up to tenant to install smoke detectors.
Had a mouse friend
Moved out over a year ago, still have not received my security deposit back (reasoning has changed many times with no support and despite reasons being discounted with proof) and landlord has stopped responding to attempts to recoup funds (even a letter from attorney) - will be taking further action when courts open up again