A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.25 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 21, 2022: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the 2nd room from east located at apt 2l, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 18, 2022: § 27-2029 adm code provide an adequate supply of heat for the apartment in the entire apartment located at apt 2l, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Apr 30, 2015: § 27-2089 adm code the premises have been vacated by an order of this department and cannot be reoccupied except for caretaker until a new certificate of occupancy has been obtained.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
Raizy Knopfler
4.2(2)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•10 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
F
Frances Frankel
3.5(1)
Site Manager•
Agent•
1 Property•4 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
N
1211 Nostrand Avenue LLC
3(8)
Corporate Owner•
25 Properties•68 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
W
Wilson & Putnam Avenue LLC
3.5(2)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•5 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Unliveable due to ineffective central heating
Former Tenant
Pros:
En suite bathroom and that separation between bedrooms. One bedroom was on the east wing of the apartment and the other on the west wing ensures minimal interaction with your roommates if you happen to have roommates you rather not see.
Cons:
The apartment supposedly had central heating but could have fooled me, because every time I put it on I felt next to nothing, not to mention that we would end up with an insane ConEd bill every month (like nearly $800 a month). Reached out to building management several dozen times with little to no response, and when they did respond, it was by giving empty promises.
Advice to owner:
Please fix the heating and electrical issues and have a more responsive building management team. There's no reason that an apartment with nearly no electrical appliances should have an $800 Coned bill.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here