213 East 92 Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11212

4 Units

Built in 1930

2 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.75 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 09, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 22, 2016: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector missing, in the entire apartment located at apt 1r, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 22, 2016: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 1r, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
6
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 20, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
Y
Yonaton Almagor
2.5(1)
Owner
1 Property4 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
A
Almagor, Yonaton
2.5(1)
Owner
1 Property4 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Sholom Greisman
2.5(1)
Site Manager
Agent
1 Property4 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 1 year ago
Livable, but not enjoyable
Former Tenant
Pros:
Not a lot of units, driveway that fits two cars (between $100 and $200 depending on what mood the landlord is in), in-unit W/D and dishwasher, lots of natural light and high ceilings. 10 min walk from train (also kind of a con, we missed being closer).
Cons:
Persistent ant (MASSIVE ones) problem, leaks that ended up being repaired by other tenants on the landlord's behalf - with property damage (never recovered) and mismatched paint, back unit is a duplex that rents out as an Air BnB year-round. Up to 10 people in and out of the place, a different group almost every week. Poor building management and lots of stolen packages. When we moved in, the mailbox could be pulled out in its entirety but was fixed about 9 months later. The front door to our building was jimmied and broken into in May of 2023 (on videotape) and when asked what he planned to do to make us, a building full of women, feel safer, he kindly explained that there was nothing wrong with the door and that he was there to help us "not the other way around." Not even sure what that meant but Chaim is just extremely unhelpful. Harmless and nice, but unhelpful. He also shows up randomly and wants to be let in.
Advice to owner:
Hire a better landlord, or be honest about the kind and quality of management tenants should expect to receive
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here