367 Maple Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11225

36 Units

Built in 1928

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.88 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
18
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Mar 24, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at 1st closet from west at north wall door frame in the foyer located at apt 6b, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
51
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 26, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... (less than 10 sq ft) at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 6b, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west original violation 17145008 issued 26-jul-24 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
34
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 14, 2024: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 5d, 4th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 27, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Patrick Smith
3.8(1)
Shareholder
Head Officer
1 Property36 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
M
361 Maple St, LLC
3.8(1)
Corporate Owner
1 Property36 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
M
361 Maple Street LLC
3.8(1)
Owner
Agent
1 Property36 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
R
Ramesh Charran
3.8(1)
Site Manager
1 Property36 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 1 year ago
Overall decent building to live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
 I lived on the first floor, but my apartment was not facing the street. So it was quite quiet and comfortable. The space is extremely big and living room is ginormous for a Brooklyn apartment. Superintendent is very responsive and helps quickly but building management is not. Pest control came once a month and would also give us mouse traps just in case, but we usually never needed them. 
Cons:
Building management is extremely terrible and unresponsive.  Packages would go missing every once in a while from someone coming into the building and stealing them. 
Advice to owner:
Take better care of the tenants and work to be more responsive and cautious of their needs 
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here