A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.5 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
6
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 26, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department ceiling and all walls in the kitchen located at apt 1k, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
42
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 26, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the missing outlet cover at south wall at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
18
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 26, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 1k, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
474 East 4th Street LLC
3.1(48)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
28 Properties•562 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
N
3420 Newkirk Avenue LLC
2.1(2)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•64 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
J
Joel Mizrahi
3.1(48)
Head Officer•
28 Properties•562 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
J
Jacob Haas
2.1(2)
Agent•
1 Property•44 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
This apartment building is ok .
Former Tenant
Pros:
Garbage is always controlled
Cons:
Multiple things.. from stolen packages to unsafeness
Advice to owner:
Do better
1.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
A Mice Infestation
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is fine.
Cons:
So many MICE, maintenance of the building is terrible (the super Lucius, is very rude) and the heat never worked in one of our rooms. No care whatsoever by the Super or Landlords. They also had little to no care about the mice. So many plumbing issues. The front door never locks appropriately.
Advice to owner:
Invest in your building and take care of the infestation of rodents!!!
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here