239 Ocean Ave,Brooklyn, NY 11225
73 Units
•Built in 1926
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.72 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
15
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 02, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 sq.ft at ceiling, east, and south walls in the bathroom located at apt 4e, 4th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
67
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 07, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). defective in the entire apartment located at apt 3c, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
43
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 13, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective in the bulkhead hinge in the public hall stairs located at public parts, 6th story, section at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 27, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Slope 239 LLC
2.9(12)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•93 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
S
Sjp LLC
3(72)
Officer•
40 Properties•1899 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 60
R
Rafi Lipschitz
2.8(7)
Agent•
1 Property•73 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
O
Orlando Hugo Castro Lopez
2.8(7)
Site Manager•
1 Property•73 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (7)
2.25 stars
1 month ago
Not worth it
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location and access to the park is the only real pro.
Cons:
They take forever to respond and do not value their tenants health or safety. The security at the building is inadequate, packages constantly stolen and recently a woman was attacked in the lobby. Too many bugs and I have never once seen an exterminator or pest control.
3.38 stars
3 months ago
Nice building, management sucks
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice building good location
Cons:
Awful management, has to be dragged kicking and screaming to make repairs
Advice to owner:
Don’t be useless
2.38 stars
3 months ago
Great neighbors, terrible landlord/management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location - proximity to park and train
Cons:
Management is god awful, most terrible people on this planet. You'll have to repeatedly report to 311 or take some sort of legal action to get anything done
4.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Pretty ok place to live for the basics
Former Tenant
Pros:
Heat is full force in this building, water pressure is great, pest control comes every week, has an elevator,
Cons:
Almost impossible to get things fixed. Packages are stolen almost often. If you are new don’t get fooled by the new everything in the apartment. Give some time for things to fall apart you won’t see or hear from them until who knows when. I’ve been messaging them for months and all they’ve managed to do is look at the damages, I mean physically look at it and do absolutely nothing. It takes months for them to fix issues that should’ve been fixed earlier. The landlord drags his feet for the tenants that live there long term so if you’re coming to live here short term, you might have a better experience but not much different from the people who currently live here. Like any landlord they would rather paint over the problem than actually fix it so it won’t have to be addressed again.
Advice to owner:
Same amount of time you put into new apartments, the tenants there need the same attention and maintenance. Stop dragging your feet to complete tasks. Plan according to your tenants, be fair. Just like you these people work and when you want to send people interferes with their income that you need. So if there is something that needs to fixed work with your tenants the won’t affect their income.
2.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
not the worst not the best
Former Tenant
Pros:
I liked the location a lot, it was a beautiful old pre-war building. My neighbors were kind and I enjoyed the sunniness of the apartment a lot.
Cons:
Mangement was pretty unresponsive to problems with plumbing and the hallways and elevator were really rough looking. There were cosmetic fixes but the building was not properly maintained: chipping and peeling paint, the elevator smelled like dog urine and made a terrible sound. The apartment was alright, we had problems with cockroaches and dampness but overall was an okay space. I wouldn’t recommend this apartment because it was impossible to contact the landlord, the super could be reached sometimes but it often took a long time to get maintenance done.
3.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
OK experience, good location
Former Tenant
Pros:
My apartment is pretty spacious, haven’t had any issues with pests, good location
Cons:
Building is not very clean, packages get stolen, floors disintegrating and need repair
1.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
run, and live anywhere else
Former Tenant
Pros:
low rent, but that's also a con
Cons:
the management is racists and homophobic. aside from this, they just don't work, including the super. there is literally a hole in my ceiling and they are refusing to fix it, give answers, or help. I was literally yelled at by the super in the halls when I asked him about fixing it.
Advice to owner:
do your job or find another
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here