40 Woodruff Avenue,Brooklyn, NY 11226
66 Units
•Built in 1940
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
114 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jun 16, 2019: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 602, 6th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
Wm Realty Mgm
3.2(5)
Agent•
1 Property•66 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
W
40 Woodruff LLC
3.1(7)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
7 Properties•143 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
J
Juda Rosonford
3.2(5)
Shareholder•
Officer•
2 Properties•125 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
J
J Rosonford
3.2(5)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•125 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
2.5 stars
4 months ago
Good space, Package Theft, Poor Maintenance
Former Tenant
Pros:
Solid square footage for rent (before the post-pandemic rent surge) and great location.
Cons:
Big problem with package and mail theft in the lobby. I would avoid the apartments that look out on the interior courtyard/recessed basement steps. Not a lot of light, people smoke on the steps, and one tenant had a medical emergency in the space and management didn’t send anyone to clean up the blood and EMT supplies left behind for months.
Advice to owner:
Create a secure dedicated mailroom and install real security cameras
4.25 stars
6 months ago
Good for the price
Former Tenant
Pros:
Relatively clean, nice neighbors, responsive to maintenance requests. Chill vibe - management not overbearing or nitpicky. Elevator. Occasional noise at normal levels. Peaceful environment. Felt safe.
Cons:
Inner facing apartments don’t get much natural light and face other sides of the building. Package theft was a big issue.
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good apartment, ABYSMAL landlords
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location/neighborhood
Super is helpful (Sterling)
Apartment is good sized
Super is helpful (Sterling)
Apartment is good sized
Cons:
Cockroaches to be expected
Maintenance is unresponsive & takes a looong time
Management truly does not care about helping you, reception is condescending & dismissive
Raised (tried to lol) rent in the middle of the Pandemic.
Has taken EVERY SINGLE UNIT OWNED off of rent stabilization
Maintenance is unresponsive & takes a looong time
Management truly does not care about helping you, reception is condescending & dismissive
Raised (tried to lol) rent in the middle of the Pandemic.
Has taken EVERY SINGLE UNIT OWNED off of rent stabilization
Advice to owner:
Get new management, and a new receptionist; Friedy showed the utmost lack of interest in doing even the bare minimum of their job.
Maintain any record of tenants beyond whether they’ve paid rent.
Generally be better
Maintain any record of tenants beyond whether they’ve paid rent.
Generally be better
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
40 Woodruff
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super is great, usually quiet building
Cons:
Management is unresponsive
No laundry
Dirty lobby/hallways
No laundry
Dirty lobby/hallways
Advice to owner:
Listen to your tenants
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Owner does not care
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location and neighborhood
Cons:
Building owners do not care about tenants AT ALL . They only care about your rent payment. The management office staff are dismissive, rude and unresponsive. The maintenance that is done is always the cheapest patchwork jobs almost never investing time and effort into actually fixing issues like leaks etc. All their vendor partners are the same, always looking for cheap ways to masks problems instead of fixing them. Mice, roaches, package thieves are all to be expected here
Advice to owner:
Stop being greedy and invest into your building and your tenants. Get rid of Fraidy from the office, her disdain for rent paying tenants is amazing. She does not treat any tenant call will concern or care