A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.58 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 03, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling and north wall at public hall, 3rd story
Show all
Hazardous
16
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 03, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: refit door in the bathroom located at apt 3j, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
10
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 19, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 hmc: remove the illegal double cylinder key operated locking device at door double cylinder lock in the entrance located at apt 3j, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Jose Suarez
2.2(3)
Site Manager•
1 Property•53 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
M
Most Reliable Mgmt
2.2(6)
Agent•
6 Properties•146 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
J
Janet Tepfer
2.5(11)
Shareholder•
Head Officer•
4 Properties•233 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
R
48 Realty Assoc LLC
2.2(3)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•107 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
3.5 stars
3 months ago
Nice spot but not as clean as it used to be
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great area right by the park. Mix of established and new tenants, new package cage
Cons:
Hard to find parking and packages used to get stolen a lot. Cleanliness of building is down a little. Have had issues with bugs on and off
1.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Unsafe for women
Former Tenant
Pros:
If you’re a male you are safe, not so much for women
Cons:
Lack of safety for women. Several women have complained about the tenant in question, landlord disregards all complaints Several women have file complaints with the police and the landlord for; harassment, stalking and menacing behavior nothing was done After harassing one woman for several months, he tried to set her apartment on fire( she left the building the week after the incident. Another female tenant was assaulted in front of the building( he chased her around the block and broke her nose and split her lips) He has been arrested several time for attempted assault and assault and the landlord continued to ignore the problem. The landlord always had an excuse about how his hands was tied and how he can’t request for the tenant to vacate the appointment through the courts. Even after several complaint about the tenant in question wich included order of protection, audio of his behavior. The landlord took no step to mitigate the situation Several female tenants have left the building because of safety concerns
Advice to owner:
If you are a women this building is unsafe and at this point its a matter of life and death.
1.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Dangerous and extremely unsafe building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the subway station
Cons:
1- your life is seriously at danger 2- Tenant on the 6th floor with mental illness threatening the life and safety of other tenants, harassing other on daily basis 3- Landlord is indifferent to tenants complaints 4- This building does not have a secure front door and is rubbed on weekly if not daily basis. 5- Major cockroach infestation throughout 6- Heat and hot water is intermittent 7- Building receives minimum service of any kind
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here