Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.4 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
41
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 01, 2023: section 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
23
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 03, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the 1st room from north located at apt 15b, 15th story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
13
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 17, 2024: § 27-2024 adm code provide adequate supply of hot water for the fixtures in kitchen in the entire apartment located at apt 15c, 15th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
Rick Elezi
3.4(5)
Officer•
3 Properties•118 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
L
271 Lenox LLC
3.3(10)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•153 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
E
Eli Karp
3.3(10)
Head Officer•
3 Properties•153 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Shpresa Nela
3.4(5)
Site Manager•
2 Properties•110 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
3.12 stars
11 months ago
Building in foreclosure, receiver hostile to tenants
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartment itself is great. Neighbors are great - real community feeling
No certificates of occupancy so no rent needs to be paid
Cons:
Wiring not up to code - had electrical fire and receiver wouldn't even reply to our messages about it.
Ignored us when kitchen sink leaking
Elevator constantly out of service, often with tenants trapped inside
Advice to owner:
Stop breaking the law and putting your tenants in danger
3.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Fine for now
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large balconies, apartment layout is nice
Cons:
Current owner is in foreclosure so building was unmanaged for a few months (no garbage collection, no one to contact for repairs, etc.). Worst thing was our front door wouldn’t lock and remained that way for months. Current management is court-assigned and temporary. They came in very aggressive and rude but now it seems like they’re doing the best they can but building still has tons of open violations and bc of that there’s no valid certificate of occupancy. Hi
4.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Too good to be true
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great lighting in the apartment, had a backyard area for dogs, washer-dryer and dishwasher amenities are great!
Cons:
Elevator sometimes did not work and is main entrance to apartments, so very inconvenient, sometimes alarms blare in lobby for weeks before being checked/turned off, management shifted hands in a really chaotic and confusing way in the middle of my stay, backyard with lawn for pets was wrecked by a storm and never fixed. Small issues around the apartment like door handles falling off/water from upstairs neighbours flooding bathroom.
Advice to owner:
Get your shit together bro
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Total Shitshow, building in foreclosure
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments are great, awesome neighbors.
Cons:
The owner, Eli Karp of Hello Living is the kind of criminal who should be barred from buying and selling real estate in NY State. He has a long paper trail of self-dealing, lying, criminal negligence and fraud.
Advice to owner:
Give up now and go away.
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great apartment, bad building management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartments are great. Well designed, great views, excellent light. Quiet and efficient a/c, in unit washer dryer.
Cons:
Elevator has repeated problems. Unresponsive building manager. Empty ground floor commercial space currently looks untidy.
Advice to owner:
Building management needs to be improved. Respond quickly to tenants requests and keep people updated if the issue cannot be immediately resolved.