Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.38 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 09, 2024: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor frame missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
12
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 01, 2023: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling and south wall in the bathroom located at apt 1l, 1st story, 3rd apartment from north at east , section ''north''
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 23, 2023: section 27-2005, 2044 hmc:provide approved one-hour fire resistance rated self-closing door at all openings to public hall, other than apartment main entrance door at building 's vestibule, east wall, at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Juda Stern
2.4(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•55 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
M
Moe Greenzweig
2.5(42)
Agent•
Head Officer•
16 Properties•636 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
W
15 & 30 Westminster Road, LLC
3.1(11)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•116 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
P
2-12 Pinehurst LLC
2.6(72)
Corporate Owner•
34 Properties•1449 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 49
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
2.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Limited frills but rent stabilized
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great price, very close proximity to Prospect Park and easy access to two transit sites. Also, the Ditmas park homes a few blocks down are gorgeous to walk to.
Cons:
Had a large rat problem outside this year due to garbage. They moved it to the front of the building for the time being, but it is still an issue in our neighborhood. Also, the supers change pretty frequently and management office does not reply quickly.
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Don’t Live Here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the park. Spacious apartments.
Cons:
The water in our apartment was leaving a brown residue. When the super looked at it, he told us it was an issue throughout the building including in his own unit. He blamed the city and said there was nothing he could do. I didn’t buy that, but I asked management to provide a record of how they were advocating on our behalf. They ignored my request. We left the building when it became clear they were either unwilling or unable to resolve the issue.
Advice to owner:
Fix you water issue. Respond to serious concerns with compassion and a willingness to do what it takes to solve the issue.
1.33 stars
Over 2 years ago
Awful building
Former Tenant
Pros:
It’s next to the park, it allows pets
Cons:
Getting something fixed is terrible, your amazon package will be stolen or opened, some people have had there things stolen when not home(break in), others when moving in. Pest infested apartments some neighbors say it’s awful and management pay for a low price exterminator that comes once every 6 months to spray your apartment and leave. The super will only come fix something after you call him 4+ to remind him or like others have said he prioritizes new tenants so people who have lived there longer have to wait. And if you plan on paying rent by money order mail, if the USPS is having trouble and your payment gets to them late because of USPS you still get charged a late fee.
Advice to owner:
Just because the area changed a bit, doesn’t mean you can make things difficult for old tenants just to upscale prices on a awful apartments
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Poorly managed, great potential
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location. Super is nice.
Cons:
The landlord is cheap and has 1 superintendent managing several buildings. Takes forever for something to be fixed. No rodents, but some areas do have roaches.
Advice to owner:
Don’t be so stingy - pay for proper repairs rather than cheap bandaid solutions.
2.33 stars
Over 2 years ago
Poor management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cute neighborhood, affordable
Cons:
Bad management - building problems never fixed, no proper recycling set up, has cockroaches