49 E 17 St,
Brooklyn, NY 11226

35 Units

Built in 1931

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
53 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.08 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jul 26, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective ceramic tiles at west wall in the bathroom located at apt 2j, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east , section at south
Show all
flag
Hazardous
23
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 26, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective glass pane at lower window sash. second from north at east in the 1st room from east at south located at apt 2j, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east , section at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jun 20, 2024: § 27-2056.6 adm code - correct the lead-based paint hazard - paint that tested positive for lead content and that is peeling or on a deteriorated subsurface - using work practices set forth in 28 rcny §11-06(b)(2) south wall, 1st window frame from west at north wall, 2nd window frame from west at north wall in the 2nd room from east located at apt 2c, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
Rafi Lipschitz
2.4(3)
Agent
1 Property35 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
R
Rudy Hernandez
2.4(3)
Site Manager
1 Property35 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
R
Raphael Lipschitz
2.3(5)
Officer
3 Properties74 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
D
Doris Konovitch
2.6(7)
Head Officer
5 Properties98 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

9 months ago
it’s not the best
Former Tenant
Pros:
spacious apartment, rent stabilized
Cons:
lots of little problems
Over 2 years ago
30 years of living
Former Tenant
Pros:
No one bothers anyone or makes trouble.
Cons:
Management has become a joke over the years
Advice to owner:
To the new management, make yourself actually known to the tenants like pervious management has done in the past.
Over 2 years ago
Don’t live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap rent for big apt, friendly on-site super who cleans/mops often in an attempt to keep up with residents littering the lobby
Cons:
Management doesn’t respond to calls or emails in general. LARGE roaches (even though I kept an IMMACULATELY clean unit because roaches terrify me), saw a dead mouse in the stairwell, heat/hot water problems often throughout the year(s), had a package stolen once, VERY loud music blasting sometimes, some residents litter the stairwells/lobby with garbage, some residents leave garbage bags/trash in the hallways, the front door lock to the building was broken sometimes leading to safety concerns
Advice to owner:
Respond to calls and emails from residents. Enforce rules throughout the building for residents safety and health