A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.6 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 27, 2022: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor [missing frame] at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
16
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Apr 22, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch at compactor door at public hall, 4th story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
10
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 22, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at trash chute at compactor closet, 5th story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
N
1040 Neilson Street Owners Corp
3.7(8)
Corporate Owner•
34 Properties•2317 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 72
M
Maria Valente
3.8(9)
Head Officer•
35 Properties•2321 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 70
M
Maxx Properties
3.8(9)
Agent•
34 Properties•2311 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 77
C
Carlos Orduz
3.8(9)
Officer•
34 Properties•2255 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 55
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
4.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great Start Rental
Former Tenant
Pros:
I lived here years ago. At the time, it was: - spacious - clean - well maintained - great area (walking distance to many types of shops and stores and this is still the case!)
Cons:
There was nothing that I didn’t like!
Advice to owner:
Continue keeping it clean, organized and secure. It’s great!
4.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Good management good people
Former Tenant
Pros:
Bought a co-op in 2006. This is a simple building without a lot of frills but well managed. Management company seems responsive and engaged. Long time super is the mayor of the block but probably retiring soon. I've been on the board and lots of good and fiscally responsible improvements. They built storage units bike storage got a hybrid oil gas water heater that saved the building $30,000 a year got floor by floor thermostats which also saved a lot of money, new elevators, and they are putting in updated water piping with new pumps to make sure water pressure on the top floor is high enough. Kept pretty clean and the neighbors are nice but switching from long time locals to new whiter and wealthier tenants. They're nice but it's a change of culture. New mailboxes are lovely and a package room is coming up plus possibly a roof deck. Laundry in the building that was updated 5 or 6 years ago.
Cons:
It has a very nice architecture but it's not what you would call a luxury building. Getting more so though. Built in 1935 so all the issues with old buildings including occasional water issues cracked plaster etc. But I'd like living here and I have never felt like the management or the super were indifferent
Advice to owner:
When the super retires it will be important to get a good new super. The super makes the building. Increase community building option if you can.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here