NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Ditmas Park
/
597 Coney Island Avenue

597 Coney Island Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11218

4 Units

Built in 1930

3 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
40 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
7.25 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 09, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 28, 2022: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective bell buzzer at building entrance to foyer south wall located at apt 1f, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
9
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 19, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective glass pane at building entrance door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
2
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 20, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Enea Myftari
2.9(2)
Site Manager
1 Property4 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
E
Emanuel Panitz
2.9(2)
Owner
1 Property4 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
P
Panitz Emanuel
2.9(2)
Owner
1 Property4 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
H
Hallmark Management Group LLC
3.5(3)
Agent
2 Properties27 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
Renter beware
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment is lovely with large windows and nice kitchen
Cons:
Roaches everywhere and a neglectful landlord
Advice to owner:
Respond to your tenants
Over 2 years ago
Bad news my dudes
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment looked great
Good water pressure
Lots of storage
Cons:
Roach and beetle infestation
Neglected tenants
Advice to owner:
Do better