400 East 14 Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11226

67 Units

Built in 1959

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
267 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.97 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
39
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 23, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation the 1st door frame from south at west wall in the foyer located at apt 4e, 4th story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
60
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 26, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code fire escape defective. adjust the dropladder so that it will slide easily in the guide rods drop ladder in down position at north at building front at fire escape
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
32
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 27, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code provide handset at the exterior at west bulkhead door to allow unobstructed re-entry from the roof to the public hall stairs.
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Aug 28, 2024: § 27-2142 adm code apts have been vacated by this department and cannot be reoccupied until so ordered after proof of compliance for apts vacate order #258722 for apartment #3f in the entire apartment located at apt, 4th story, 4th apartment from north at east
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
Westleigh Company LLC
2.8(7)
Agent
Corporate Owner
2 Properties151 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
R
Richard Marshel
3.1(11)
Officer
3 Properties200 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
C
Clarence Slusher
2.6(5)
Site Manager
1 Property67 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
L
Laura Rodie
3.1(7)
Head Officer
2 Properties146 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (5)

7 months ago
Broken pipes, broken hear
Former Tenant
Pros:
The other tenants were nice people
Cons:
Upstairs neighbor's toilet outlet pipe burst one morning, flooding our bathroom with their sewage. Management was extremely slow to respond, and the super did a really subpar job of remediating the sewage floor. Our bathroom ceiling was fully saturated with sewage and they would not replace it. Took 3 days to hunt down the owner of the building so we could break our lease. Outside of the sewage incident, the building had a bad roach problem and garbage was constantly piled up in the courtyard.
Over 2 years ago
My experience at 400 Rugby Road
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Great building for a family of 4+
-Maintenance are up kept
-Great lobby space
-Sensible door man
-Washer & Dryer
-Private back yard
Cons:
Doorman should be around for 12 hours
Package are susceptible to theft
Advice to owner:
Hire younger staff
Over 2 years ago
Moving out
Former Tenant
Pros:
Spacious apartment size
Cons:
Terrible management, pest and cleanliness issues.
Advice to owner:
Don't be a slumlord.
Over 2 years ago
Management is unresponsive and does not adequately fix issues.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The size of the units are very spacious and it’s located on a relatively quiet block (for apt buildings). It’s a 3 minute walk to the Cortelyou Q station and 15 minutes to Prospect Park. One of the few dog friendly buildings in the area.
Cons:
The landlord is extremely unresponsive for any issue. We have had issues with leaks in the same spot for years, the repairs have only put a cosmetic bandage and has started to leak again. This has happened with other fixes (soap dish in shower breaking - slicing my knee open and needing stitches, cabinetry repeatedly breaking in same area. Our dishwasher has repeatedly broke in the same place and instead of replacing they put a temporary fix. Good luck getting the current super to actually come by, despite setting up specific times, he rarely shows up when requested which is very frustrating when we would have to take off work. There are consistently issues with roaches in the building and not properly addressed. There have been bed bug infestations in units and common areas (laundry room) and tenants were never notified.

No one from triton reality responds to emails regarding unit issues or billing issues. It takes many attempts and we rarely receive a response. No ones answers the office number.
Advice to owner:
Please respond to tenants concerns.
Over 2 years ago
Not the worst
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location and neighbors
Cons:
Noise from above apartment
Too few washers and dryers
Super not great