NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Kensington
/
102 Albemarle Road

102 Albemarle Road,
Brooklyn, NY 11218

45 Units

Built in 1939

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 102 Albemarle Road
unit
Kensington
102 Albemarle Road #E4
$3,811
3 beds1 bathEst. Jun 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.55 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 15, 2015: § 300 m/d law file plans and application and legalize the following alteration or restore to the legal condition existing prior to the making of said alteration plywood covered door at east wall in the 1st room from east located at apt a4, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
6
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 01, 2023: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... approximately 25 sq ft at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt e5, 5th story, 3rd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 17, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latch set at compactor closet door at compactor closet, 1st story, section at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
149 4 Ave LLC
2.9(62)
Agent
Corporate Owner
17 Properties243 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
N
Neera Raj
2.9(12)
Site Manager
Head Officer
2 Properties53 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
P
Prashanth Rayapudi
2.8(64)
Site Manager
Head Officer
18 Properties243 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
A
102 Albemarle Associates LLC
2.9(12)
Agent
Corporate Owner
2 Properties53 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (9)

4 months ago
beautiful building, awful management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Priced decently for the amount of space, bedrooms get good sunlight, laundry in building, dishwasher in unit, great location right above the subway, beautiful neighborhood
Cons:
roaches, leaks, management does not respond to tenant issues in a timely manner, mold?, water damaged walls (big time)
Advice to owner:
Invest in contractors who will get the job done instead of having super fix all the problems. The super cannot solve major building issues.
9 months ago
2014- 2017 Review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Excellent location! Charming lobby space.
Cons:
We had issues with water leaking to downstairs neighbors on the ground floor that required access to our apartment to fix, but it was an ongoing issue. This was 2017 though so it may have been resolved.
10 months ago
Worst Landlord Ever
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful old building with some original features.
Cons:
The landlord, Neera Raj, is not an honorable person. Letting conditions of building deteriorate.
Elderly and disabled residents homebound for multiple months while management dragged their feet on necessary fixes to the elevator—which they only got started on after being fined by DOB. Lies about sending workers, pest control, etc. Lies about how market-rate units were destablized. Lies lies lies.
Advice to owner:
Get back in touch with your humanity.
Over 1 year ago
Great building, bad landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building and apartment are very nice. In the perfect location, right next to the subway and an amazing neighborhood. Fairly affordable for the area.
Cons:
Landlord takes forever to respond to issues and usually when fixing things they do it the easy way instead of the right way.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive
Over 1 year ago
Beautiful building, slumlord management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building itself has great bones and could be really beautiful if well-maintained. Location relative to transit is unbeatable. Some original architectural elements are intact, like built-ins, bathroom storage compartments, and arched doorways - make it feel special. Neighborhood is delightful. Some apartments are roomy and have lots of windows.
Cons:
The management is atrocious. Greedy, cheap, dishonest, and uncaring. Many elderly and disabled tenants are homebound and even more isolated when elevator would go out or malfunction (which happened too often). Hot water, and even water, has been known to go out with little warning or provision of repair timeline. Pests are an issue. Repairs take a long time to happen, and are done on the cheap. Landlords will also withhold security deposits if you don't leave the apartment in more pristine condition than you found it (even if there is no water in the building during move-out, making cleaning impossible). It's such a waste of a good building.
Advice to owner:
Don't be a landlord if you're not prepared to take care of your building and your tenants. Get another job.
Over 2 years ago
un managed building
Former Tenant
Pros:
location, bedroom size
Cons:
roaches, shoddy repairs, owners couldn’t care less about tenants
Over 3 years ago
Decent apartment living
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, laundry in basement, great location
Cons:
Everything is very old but apartments have great bones. In dire need of renovations. Rents are high.
Advice to owner:
For the amount of rent you charge you should take a look at the apartments themselves and do more than a fresh coat of paint between tenants.
Over 3 years ago
Not the best
Former Tenant
Pros:
Distance to the train, one of the supers is super sweet!
Cons:
Landlord mean, black mold shower, heat doesn’t work, elevator broken constantly, you can ONLY pay with checks,
Advice to owner:
Be nicer to your renters
Over 3 years ago
Nice Building with Sketchy Owner
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Great neighbors
-Directly on top of subway
-Live in super
-Laundry in building
Cons:
-Illegally destabilized units
-Illegal conversion from 2 bedroom into 3 bedroom with a wall splitting a window
-Tenants association determined many repairs were done cheaply and repairs were still needed
-Management will try to overcharge for many things
-Landlords kept security of tenants for late rent payments that were not sent late
Advice to owner:
Do not try and squeeze money out of your tenants and stop being cheap about necessary repairs.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here