Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent reviews for 392 EAST 4 STREET in Brooklyn reveal significant issues with cleanliness, pest control, and management responsiveness. Tenants face pest infestations, unaddressed maintenance, and unresponsive management despite friendlyneighbors and a quiet environment. Rent increases without corresponding improvements in building upkeep have led renters to question the value of staying. The lack of meaningful action on persistent pest problems raises concerns about the efficacy of existing pest control measures. Overall, the building's favorable location and neighborhood are overshadowed by subpar living conditions and management neglect, urging potential renters to proceed with caution.
The average number of violations per unit at 392 East 4 Street is better than the city.
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 12, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the foyer , the bathroom located at apt 7, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 07, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). defective in the entire apartment located at apt 7, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
9
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 07, 2024: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the 1st room from east located at apt 7, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
B
Bernard Bernar
2.2(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•28 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 3
B
Bk7 Holdings LLC
2.4(6)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•32 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
N
Nathanel Aharonoff
3(6)
Head Officer•
3 Properties•38 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
1.75 stars
7 months ago
good location, no upkeep
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is great, very near a reliable F/G stop, and walkable to Ditmas and Flatbush
Cons:
Since the building changed ownership a few years back there was a lot of super turnover and for awhile we had none. There is one now, but the management company is still very unreachable. No repairs and upkeep.
2.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Deal with Pests
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet building, and neighborhood (mostly families).
Cons:
Roaches - that was a constant struggle and that was the main reason why I decided to move out.
Advice to owner:
You cannot just try to renovate apartments and try to cover the problem, some of those units need immediate attention
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great neighborhood, poor management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Love the neighborhood and neighbors.
Cons:
Mice and roaches, no response when brought to their attention, rent too high
1.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Disappointing and icky and hiking rent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, relatively quiet.
Cons:
Building is old, dirty. Rat coming out of tenant’s trash bag left in lobby. Welcomed by roaches, water bugs and a mouse (I hope it wasn’t a baby rat based on the lobby rat) in the apt. Building hasn’t been cleaned (swept, mopped) in a long time. Population of building doesn’t seem bothered by the lack of cleaning or the pests. Exterminator is available but based on them not using him on the apt I’m in before I got here how good is he? So I’m constantly battling them, have a cat can’t use exterminator. Every time an apt is emptied on same floor they’re on the move again. Huge gaps under apt front doors allows easy pest access, as do all the cracks and gaps left unchecked. I’m constantly spraying. The trash system outside is ineffective due to number of tenants - it attracts rats. As does the vegetation outside - it’s nice in the daytime but at night I avoid taking trash out since I heard rustling in it. Old buildings need to be given special care to keep them pest resistant - this hasn’t happened here. Without the pests I’d be okay in a basic, not sexy, walkup, without the standard appliances but that’s not the case. If I knew then what I know now.
Advice to owner:
None - they’re aware of the conditions (last super left building to go work for their management co.) doubt they care. If/when the majority of the building demographic changes, the building will likely be renovated. Or like other gentrified spaces, renovated apt. by apt. as needed.
2.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Pests galore — beware!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Friendly neighbors, quiet building
Cons:
Roach infestations, mice, unresponsive management/landlord/super, water damage that went untreated, could only pay rent via mail, never ever saw an exterminator on the premises even though 1.5+ inch cockroaches were all over the lobby.
Advice to owner:
Be better
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here