A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.19 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
40
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at north wall at bulkhead east 1 at public hall stairs, 6th story
Show all
Hazardous
132
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective counter balances at lower window sash in the kitchen located at apt b59, 5th story, 2nd apartment from north at east , section at southwest
Show all
Immediately hazardous
89
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 14, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt a34, 3rd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
Alert:
One of owners and associates from this building was on the Worst Landlord Watchlist
M
Mitchell Shpelfogel
1.9(7)
Worst Landlord•
Head Officer•
5 Properties•281 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 23
R
Reuven Furer
2.3(6)
Site Manager•
1 Property•119 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 10
G
Galina Shpelfogel
1.9(7)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
8 Properties•396 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
S
Sam Shpelfogel
2.3(6)
Shareholder•
1 Property•119 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Could be much better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big rooms, great location.
Cons:
Dirty, neglected, was a pristine property prior to being sold in 2009.
Advice to owner:
Restore building to previous habitable and beautiful state.
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Don't rent here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, close to buses and train.
Cons:
Dirty building.I had mice and roaches. Management doesn't take care of problems. Have a leak for 5 months and I am still waiting.
Advice to owner:
Take care of your tenants
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
This building has been decaying over the years.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Absolutely nothing nice to say about this building
Cons:
Everything, unqualified workers
1.83 stars
Over 3 years ago
DO NOT RENT
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighborhood, weed smoking, nice neighbors
Cons:
Building is falling apart, ROACHES, MICE!! HOT WATER TURNS OFF REPEATEDLY with NO WARNING.... no water at times, apartment is leaking sometimes... walls peeling plaster, packages stolen sometimes ! Not cleaned as often as should !
Advice to owner:
DO BETTER TO UP KEEP YOUR BUILDING
2.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
They don’t maintain common areas.
Former Tenant
Pros:
There are many things I liked about building. Building on downward spiral since changing ownership.
Cons:
Very dirty building.
Advice to owner:
Please clean common areas.
2.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Lots mice bugs dirty ass hell
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big apartment are nice
Cons:
Very dirty need paint has mice and roaches bugs ps. Get rid people smoking weed. Also fix camera. For better seturity
Advice to owner:
You need get better staff. That would take care or building like if they own it. It really nice building. If get right people clean 3 time week. And Retouch paint in hallway. Never saw súper here.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here