NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Bay Ridge
/
321 Ovington Avenue

321 Ovington Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11209

119 Units

Built in 1928

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 10
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
279 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.1 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
71
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at north wall at bulkhead east 1 at public hall stairs, 6th story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
188
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2026 adm code replace the broken or defective washbasin in the bathroom located at apt a34, 3rd story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
110
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2043.1 hmc install the missing or repair/replace the defective window guard(s) in accordance with the specifications of the new york city health code section 24 rcny chapter 12. wg to install = 1; wg to replace = 0; wg to repair = 0; in the bathroom located at apt a34, 3rd story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Mitchell Shpelfogel
1.9(7)
Head Officer
5 Properties281 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 20
R
Reuven Furer
2.3(6)
Site Manager
1 Property119 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
G
Galina Shpelfogel
1.9(7)
Agent
Corporate Owner
8 Properties396 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
S
Sam Shpelfogel
2.3(6)
Shareholder
1 Property119 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (6)

Over 2 years ago
Could be much better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big rooms, great location.
Cons:
Dirty, neglected, was a pristine property prior to being sold in 2009.
Advice to owner:
Restore building to previous habitable and beautiful state.
Over 2 years ago
Don't rent here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, close to buses and train.
Cons:
Dirty building.I had mice and roaches.
Management doesn't take care of problems.
Have a leak for 5 months and I am still waiting.
Advice to owner:
Take care of your tenants
Over 2 years ago
This building has been decaying over the years.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Absolutely nothing nice to say about this building
Cons:
Everything, unqualified workers
Over 2 years ago
DO NOT RENT
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighborhood, weed smoking, nice neighbors
Cons:
Building is falling apart, ROACHES, MICE!! HOT WATER TURNS OFF REPEATEDLY with NO WARNING.... no water at times, apartment is leaking sometimes... walls peeling plaster, packages stolen sometimes ! Not cleaned as often as should !
Advice to owner:
DO BETTER TO UP KEEP YOUR BUILDING
Over 2 years ago
They don’t maintain common areas.
Former Tenant
Pros:
There are many things I liked about building. Building on downward spiral since changing ownership.
Cons:
Very dirty building.
Advice to owner:
Please clean common areas.
Over 2 years ago
Lots mice bugs dirty ass hell
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big apartment are nice
Cons:
Very dirty need paint has mice and roaches bugs ps. Get rid people smoking weed. Also fix camera. For better seturity
Advice to owner:
You need get better staff. That would take care or building like if they own it. It really nice building. If get right people clean 3 time week. And Retouch paint in hallway. Never saw súper here.