317 100 Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11209

83 Units

Built in 1962

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.3 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jul 29, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective gasket at refrigerator door in the kitchen located at apt 2b, 2nd story, 4th apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
19
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 18, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes at building front, south exterior, 2nd stack from west, satelite dish at fire escape, 2nd story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 28, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at door in the entrance located at apt 2b, 2nd story, 4th apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
James Kanellis
2.1(7)
Site Manager
1 Property83 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
E
Esther Schwartz
2.1(7)
Officer
1 Property83 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
L
Leonard Schwartz
2.2(24)
Shareholder
Agent
Head Officer
19 Properties1070 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
V
Verazzano LLC
1.8(9)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties163 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 8
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (7)

5 months ago
Horrible place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
The view would be great
Cons:
Horrible building and super
Advice to owner:
Do your job
Over 2 years ago
Cheap but TERRIBLE
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Rent stabilized
- The super is nice
Cons:
- Several mentally ill tenants
- Many neighbors were addicts or alcoholics
- Landlord once asked me to "physically rough up" another tenant
- Roaches, roaches, roaches!!
- "Exterminator" is a fraud
- Maintenance issues
- Horrible landlord
- Terrible management
- Impressively bad leaks that never get fixed
- The elevator never works
- Always hot in the winter and summer (even with ac on still 90+ deg in my room in the winter)
- Dark corridors
- Dirty
- Basement is filthy
- Basement door never locked so homeless people stay in the building
- Drug dens on first two floors
- Security deposit not returned, all requests ignored or turned down
- Kitchen appliances only half work and management refuses to fix them
- Most plumbing regularly floods or fails in other ways (eg. shower drain regurgitates)
Advice to owner:
- Maintain the property
- Don't ask tenants to "rough up" other tenants
Over 3 years ago
Not too bad
Former Tenant
Pros:
There is a great Superintendant.
Cons:
The landlord is horrible.
Advice to owner:

Over 3 years ago
Lousy superintendent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nothing besides low rent for location
Cons:
Roaches, 1st floor smells like cat urine
Advice to owner:
Get rid of the superintendent
Over 3 years ago
cheap and awful
Former Tenant
Pros:
extremely cheap and large
Cons:
disgusting building, saw roaches daily and not the tiny ones, the whole building was infested
Advice to owner:
exterminate your whole building
Over 3 years ago
Stay away from it
Former Tenant
Pros:
I moved because the apartment was very large and there is laundry in the building. It's also rent stabilized
Cons:
Pest, landlord, filthy, extremely old kitchen
Advice to owner:
Answer the calls
Over 3 years ago
Run far away
Former Tenant
Pros:
extremely cheap rent
Cons:
Everything
-Tiles falling in the shower
-Multiple cockroaches (everywhere)
-Garbage everywhere
-Super is not responsive, nothing is ever fixed
Advice to owner:
Maintain your property
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here