Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.55 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 18, 2024: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
18
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 18, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant materials at ceiling at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 18, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove the illegal fastening 1st door at west leading to the rear yard at lobby consisting of slidebold capable of being padlocked at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
G
Grace Court LLC
3.4(3)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
Agent•
2 Properties•75 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
J
John Psaras
3(24)
Head Officer•
19 Properties•425 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
M
Mike Psaras
3(7)
Site Manager•
Officer•
2 Properties•79 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
M
Mike Psaras
3.4(3)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
Agent•
2 Properties•75 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
2.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Wouldn’t recommend to anyone
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighborhood, easy transport commute, rent stable
Cons:
The apartment came with holes, staples and pins on the floor, roaches in the kitchen, large sewage roaches in the bathroom and no window locks. The landlord and super are so hard to communicate with and often like to gaslight us about pest problems. There is a pest sign up sheet for the building but they seem to not show up. The super is rude and reluctant to be helpful.
Advice to owner:
Get a new super, someone who is more communicative. Also, start accepting electronic payments.
4.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
More power needed!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good size apartment for the price
Cons:
Minimal outlets, no dedicated a/c circuit in bedroom or living room. No option to e-pay - need paper checks.
Advice to owner:
Update electric & install outlets for a/c. Add an e-pay option - many banks are not issuing personal paper checks anymore.
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Could do better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap as for Brooklyn and it’s all pros
Cons:
No elevator, had no cameras until recently and that’s why many packages were stolen, heat could do better, it’s not always warm especially at nights, staircase was washed once when covid started (pro super got scared), no storage spaced, apartments are old, not renovated ever
Advice to owner:
Invest in new things, these apartments stay the same since 1930s, the doors can be easily knocked down, windows pass through lots of air, that’s why heat doesn’t hold well, the hot water takes forever to come to the upper floors and it’s very limited, 5 min show the water is hot and the rest it’s cold, super says because everyone is using the water at the same time which is impossible