A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.02 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Mar 12, 2020: § 27-2045 adm code post a proper notice of smoke detector requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, at or near the mail box missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
828 St Johns Tower LLC
3.2(69)
Corporate Owner•
63 Properties•676 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 44
J
Joseph Lichtman
3.3(35)
Agent•
Head Officer•
19 Properties•329 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
O
Otts Ocean LLC
2.8(5)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•123 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
B
Burim Haulli
3.3(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•116 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3.5 stars
2 months ago
Overpriced cheap apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Central air, parking, locked package room, convenient location, great neighborhood, pet friendly
Cons:
Amenities haven’t been maintained in years, washer/dryers are consistently broken, removed the 24hr doorman for “monitored security company” that only works half the time leaving guests stuck outside and package room inaccessible, management company refuses to acknowledge problems in the building, tenant app that allowed people to see packages and submit maintenance request has been removed, cheaply constructed apartment, expect mold and thin walls
Advice to owner:
The doormen were the best feature of this building. Stop cutting corners on amenities and find a management company that actually manages
2 stars
4 months ago
Overpriced Building Breaking Down
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful View from balcony
Cons:
Management makes changes with zero notice, such as trying to quietly push Doorman out by installing a self service 24 hour package room. Everywhere is falling apart. Rooftop looks like it hasn't been looked after since built. Gym machines are mostly broken and never given maintenance. Laundry room ALWAYS has half of the machines non usable. Then the apartments are even worse. Made on the cheap quickly. So expect atleast 2 appliances to break. Mold In bathroom and peeling walls do to shotty work. Ahh and the garage is infested with rats. Place is a dump for the ridiculous prices they charge for neighborhood.
Advice to owner:
Get new management! Someone who actually does their job!
3.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Decent place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Newer building decent appliances
Cons:
the neighbors the literally let anyone live here
Advice to owner:
background check the people you let living here
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice workers, relatively clean all the way around, nice amenities
Cons:
The amenities were not kept up very well, and the place is a little expensive.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here