NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Midwood
/
2425 Nostrand Avenue

2425 Nostrand Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11210

178 Units

Built in 1955

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 25
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.56 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
25
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 03, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 209, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
43
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 10, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the 4th room from north located at apt 509, 5th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
32
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 03, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latch at staircase door at public hall, 4th story, section ''center''
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
H
Hamo Radoncic
2.5(11)
Site Manager
1 Property178 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 25
N
2425 Nostrand Avenue CO LLC
2.5(11)
Agent
Corporate Owner
2 Properties193 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 25
C
Cheryl Smith
2.8(81)
Agent
Corporate Owner
86 Properties3315 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 183
M
Michael Malek
2.8(46)
Officer
50 Properties1726 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 108
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (11)

Over 2 years ago
Apartment was ok, building not so much
Former Tenant
Pros:
Had garage parking attached to the building for an extra fee, laundry in building, elevators
Cons:
Loud neighbors, management was slow to respond, only one heater in a 2bd apartment, not a lot to do in the area if you don’t have kids or don’t like sports bars, 15 minute walk to trains
Over 2 years ago
Avoid at all costs.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment had a nice layout. The views from the fire escape outside of my window were pleasant.
Cons:
Everything else. It was a poorly maintained building in every way - dirty, unsafe, packages would regularly get stolen, there were problems with pests, things would break down in our apartment too often, etc. Management was frustrating and didn't communicate well.
Advice to owner:
Do better, plain and simple.
Over 2 years ago
Decent at best
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighborhood is good, close to supermarkets and Flatbush Junction
Cons:
People sleeping in hallway sometime, Management takes a long time to repair. Mild pest problems. People always breaking downstairs lock. People steal packages.
Over 2 years ago
Not a terrible building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Affordable rent, quiet neighborhood, laundry in building
Cons:
Poor maintenance, Super is unresponsive, elevator is in unreliable
Over 3 years ago
Fine but should be better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Price, laundry in building worked
Cons:
some roaches, common areas not kept very clean, super is very hard to find, had several packages stolen, garbage is hoarded in the back courtyard and i have seen opossums there!
Advice to owner:
get more attentive supers and actually clean your common areas
Over 3 years ago
Worst Management Co
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartment size was good
Cons:
Unresponsive management
Leak in bathroom was never fixed and wouldn’t reduce rent
Infested with roaches and mice
Advice to owner:
Take care of people!
Over 3 years ago
Do not move here!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, nothing else
Cons:
Everything!

I had leaking issues, and mold growing out of my walls. They charged to much for horrible housing and lazy supers
Advice to owner:
Lower your rent and fix the building! Pipes are leaking! It’s rodent infested! Stop being a slum lord!
Over 3 years ago
Do not rent from here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nothing was good
Cons:
Roaches , bed bugs , mice, smelly pipes
Advice to owner:
Take care of your building , stop being cheap!!
Over 3 years ago
My apartment is adequate but always room for improvement
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, sufficient heat and hot water, location, tenant association, friendly super and porters. I personally have not had any real issues with things not being fixed in my apartment. I have only had to contact the office once when the super didn't show as scheduled. Management called the super and he came the next day.
Cons:
Thin walls and floors, lobby floors can use an upgrade, occasionally some 420 neighbors/guests smoke in the hallway/on the fire escapes at night, when neighbors slam doors it can be felt in adjacent apartments
Advice to owner:
Update some general areas, better landscaping on the outside
Over 3 years ago
Disappointing, Poorly Maintained
Former Tenant
Pros:
I appreciate that there’s a tenant committee and obviously people who live here who are committed to improving their living situation. The neighbors are considerate and we have no noise issues.
Cons:
The management is a nightmare. The super is extremely unresponsive, and it takes an incredible amount of effort to receive the repairs you need (you won’t be let know when they’ll happen either- just be ready 24/7.) There are consistent pest issues, with roaches and bedbugs, and I’ve heard from other tenants that they end up paying out of pocket to deal with these problems rather than trust management. It’s very hard to get mail, and the mailboxes were severely compromised for at least six months- both in terms of keeping our mail private, and not injuring people or postal carriers in the process.
Over 3 years ago
The land of NO repairs
Former Tenant
Pros:
I do not pay for light or gas
Cons:
Repairs never get done
Advice to owner:
Do the repairs get rid of trash tenants
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here