A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.4 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 14, 2018: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the missing escutcheon plate of the riser at ceiling in the 2nd bathroom from east located at apt 5l, 5th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
37
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 10, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector missiing in the entire apartment located at apt 6t, 6th story, 4th apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
23
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 10, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 6t, 6th story, 4th apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
1625 Rockaway Parkway Owner, LLC
2.7(2)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•169 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
J
Jana Schmidt
3.4(41)
Officer•
21 Properties•1036 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 39
A
Antoinette Travaglino
3.4(32)
Agent•
Head Officer•
19 Properties•916 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 32
N
170 North 5th Street Owner, LLC
3.4(41)
Corporate Owner•
20 Properties•1000 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 36
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Not So Great
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenient location for shopping areas Close to parks and not too far from transportation
Cons:
If they are cleaning, it’s in vain, because you couldn’t tell...
Advice to owner:
Get new suppers and find a better door man
1.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Don't judge a book by it's cover
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to public transportation
Cons:
Tenants are loud, rude disrespectful. Cannabis can be smelled throughout the building especially in the hallways. People are hanging out in front of the building smoking cannabis. Cleanness of the building is good but tenants and their guests do not maintain. Management can be rude and dissmsive when you call the office about a complaint
Advice to owner:
Do a better job at screening potential tenants
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here