Glassworks at 334 Himrod St,
Brooklyn, NY 11237

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 hour ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
-- violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 29, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (16)

2 months ago
One of a kind in NYC
Former Tenant
Pros:
Incredible blend of preserving the original 1888 industrial building charm with all the modern benefits. Great proximity to the L.
Cons:
Management was slow to respond to service requests. There is no visibility into electrical as a private company is being used with no customer service in place of ConEd.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive
5 months ago
A beautiful building with some serious drawbacks
Former Tenant
Pros:
Gorgeous facade, parking lot, laundry room, garden.
Cons:
Building has some serious issues, despite (or because of) being new. Leaks are widespread, and as a result, some units have serious mold issues, and the landlord delays addressing them. A pregnant tenant was in one of the units with serious mold and had to move because it was not remediated. Nice amenities but swiftly falling apart. The black side of the building gets extremely hot in the summer, doors and windows are not sealed properly so heat and cold escapes, escalating utility costs. Gym AC does not work. Property Manager lies at every convenience and is terrible at her job. OUR UNIT WAS RENT STABILIZED AND IT WAS KEPT A SECRET. WE WERE OVER CHARGED FOR YEARS.
Advice to owner:
Things will only get worse if you don't address damages now
5 months ago
Building Super is the best
Former Tenant
Pros:
Darien, the super, is the saving grace of the building. The building is poorly managed, emails do not get responded to and construction to improve facilities are not done in a timely manner. But Darien keeps the building clean, is friendly and goes above and beyond when it comes to helping the tenants out.
Cons:
Building management sucks. Christina cherry picks who she wants to. She also lies & has messed with peoples personal property.
Advice to owner:
Get a new building manager.
5 months ago
lazy Porter superintendent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Leaving the premises
Cons:
Big cleaning guy was not doing anything all day. Building smells like trash Front glass was filthy not to mention carpet inside of building was disgusting as if the place never got vacuumed. Cleaning person seamed very Slow and Lazy.
Advice to owner:
Get a New Super
Over 1 year ago
It was fine
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the subway, great views. Big units for price and location.
Cons:
Overcharged for electricity and nothing was done about it. Seems there is too much work and they don't have enough staff to maintain the building. Everyone seems to be fed up with the way the property is managed. Also, packages get stolen often and the building doesn't feel secure.
Over 1 year ago
Worst new Property Manager & Super. People move in and move out quickly.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is great
Cons:
Property Manager sucks & the apartments are falling apartment cheap labor.
Building received an F Grade for Building Energy Efficiency Rating. We also have none residents coming into the building sleeping, eating, smoking and watching television in the Lounge Room. The Tenets of the building have requested the amenities be locked to prevent outsiders and they are refusing to do so. FYI the gym is closed and is not going to reopen even though it is still being advised.
Advice to owner:
The property manager doesn't care
Over 2 years ago
Adequate but barely
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice aesthetic, on-site maintenance staff is wonderful.
Cons:
Management is ignorant and/or incompetent. Building is a target for theft and vagrancy and very little done to remedy this issue. Amenities are either a lie or in disarray.
Over 2 years ago
4 months no heat/AC in a penthouse apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Darien (super) gets everything done and actually cares.
The building manager absolutely ghosts everyone, but upper management still keeps her placed.
Cons:
$3800-4100 for 2BRs and you get very poor service. One neighbor got mold in the walls after months of complaining about leaks went unfixed, according to our neighbors. Our other neighbor has a broken patio door that they refuse to replace. It’s the only window as well.

In our case, our AC/heating unit tested positive for allergenic mold internally and externally. It took us a month just to get someone scheduled because all ASH staff (except the super) completely ghosted us until we put together legal action.

With a newborn on the way, we may again have to rely on legal action just to get the heater installed.

It’s absolutely mind blowing how they handle tenants here.

A note about the area: Bushwick used to be in its way to being cleaned up. But it’s taken a few steps backward with the loss of Graffiti cleanup, theft, and locals shooting up in front of the building.
Advice to owner:
Not sure why you don’t care. If money is your motivation for your jobs, then remember that money flow is built on good relationships and reputation.
Over 2 years ago
Great, well-maintained building
Former Tenant
Pros:
The lobby and rooftop were always clean and maintained. The virtual doorman was great, and made building access safe and easy. Trash room was cleaned and emptied regularly.
Cons:
The package room got disorganized sometimes, and it could be difficult to find packages.
Advice to owner:
I really appreciated how this building is maintained.
Over 2 years ago
Overpriced, poorly built
Former Tenant
Pros:
Aesthetically pretty, large terraces, elevator, gym, pet-friendly, on-site parking
Cons:
Not insulated properly causing high electric bill, overpriced, no overhead lighting in living or bedrooms, floors not sealed which causes stains, mice, cheaply and poorly built, laundry in building is expensive and dryers don’t dry, structural damage due to rain
Advice to owner:
Fix your building and don’t threaten to evict tenants when they report damage
Over 2 years ago
Thank God for the super
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice layout to our apartment, outside space, laundry in building, super is amazing and uses how own time and money to help tenants
Cons:
Elevator frequently out of service so limited accessibility, building management shut down the gym that was there when we moved in and did not plan to replace it, took over a year to get repairs done in our unit, you have to pay 50% more for electric thanks to some third party app the building uses, windows are 100% unsealed and leak air and water
Advice to owner:
Please restore the gym and invest to make the building more energy efficient; surcharge on electricity is offensive
Over 2 years ago
Expensive and not worth it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building looks nice, apartment layouts are good. Darien the super is excellent. A block from the subway.
Cons:
The apartments are incredibly drafty and very expensive to heat and cool. The heating units are extremely finicky and need to be serviced a lot. The amenities have been getting progressively worse (gym was taken away, furniture in common spaces being taken out). A lot of the apartments have water leaks. Every so often non-residents sneak into the building and destroy property.
Advice to owner:
The rent is really expensive for what tenants get.
Over 2 years ago
Everything breaks, way overpriced, property manager is terrible at her job
Former Tenant
Pros:
Near to subway, package room, nice looking
Cons:
So pricy for what it is and absolutely not worth it
Over 3 years ago
Leaks all over the building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Storage and parking extra charge
Cons:
Gym is close and no COVID-19 changes has been made to keep us safe.
Advice to owner:
Answer our emails. 
Over 3 years ago
336 Himrod st
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice outdoor spaces and working laundry, the super Darien is an incredibly nice guy and very attentive despite management not being as attentive
Cons:
Gym has been unavailable for a year
Over 3 years ago
Best in Bushwick
Former Tenant
Pros:
Floor plan, space, responsiveness of management company
Cons:
Floodlights from parking lot across the street shine directly into apartments, even with blinds closed.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here