NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Park Slope
/
80 St Marks Avenue
Park Slope

80 St Marks Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11217

8 Units

•

Built in 1920

•

5 Floors

3.2(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    1.75 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    5
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 16, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    4
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 15, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes flower pots 3rd story balcony north at building rear at fire escape, 3rd story
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    2
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 03, 2022: § 27-2029 adm code provide an adequate supply of heat for the apartment in the entire apartment located at apt 3b, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    3
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 27, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    Rs Jz Bedford N-6th LLC
    3.5(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    12 Properties•24 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    S
    76-82 St. Marks Spe, LLC
    3.5(3)
    Corporate Owner•
    5 Properties•17 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    J
    Jose Tinizhanay
    3.5(3)
    Site Manager•
    4 Properties•14 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    B
    Benjamin Stokes
    3.5(3)
    Head Officer•
    5 Properties•17 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (2)

    Over 3 years ago
    Red Sky is terrible
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Nice building. The units were well maintained and the supers were generally helpful.
    Cons:
    Battled red sky for nearly our entire year long lease to manage the unit properly and fix issues. They did not provide hot water consistently— it was regularly well below the legal minimum of 120 and red sky would not respond and fix it. It took months of emailing and calling 311 for them to do something. It was incredibly frustrating. Other instances of unprofessionalism and mismanagement: they emailed the building residents at ~1pm on a weekday saying our building’s front door locks were being changed and we had to arrive home by 6pm to get a new copy. This is not possibly for many working folks let alone folks in less accessible industries (e.g. service) and showed a complete disregard for the tenants.
    Advice to owner:
    Give a shit about your tenants.
    Over 3 years ago
    Absentee Landlord - Redsky
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Renovated spacious apartments with lots of storage space

    Location near multiple subway stations.
    Cons:
    Building entrance needs updates. Intercom is broken. Intercom nameplates and mailbox nameplates do not get updated. Stairwell has never been painted. Landlord is not prompt to fix issues. Garbage and recycling situation has become a roach attraction.
    Advice to owner:
    Fix everything and lease up the retail to tenants that would be an amenity to the building.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here